Kiowa vs Houma Disability Age 35 to 64
COMPARE
Kiowa
Houma
Disability Age 35 to 64
Disability Age 35 to 64 Comparison
Kiowa
Houma
17.4%
DISABILITY AGE 35 TO 64
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
345th/ 347
METRIC RANK
18.7%
DISABILITY AGE 35 TO 64
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
347th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Kiowa vs Houma Disability Age 35 to 64 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 56,099,000 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Kiowa and percentage of population with a disability between the ages 34 and 64 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.174 and weighted average of 17.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 36,789,508 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Houma and percentage of population with a disability between the ages 34 and 64 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.824 and weighted average of 18.7%, a difference of 7.7%.
Disability Age 35 to 64 Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Kiowa | Houma |
| Minimum | 8.3% | 10.2% |
| Maximum | 46.2% | 57.5% |
| Range | 37.8% | 47.3% |
| Mean | 21.6% | 21.7% |
| Median | 22.4% | 17.1% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 16.1% | 15.4% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 26.7% | 22.1% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 10.6% | 6.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 7.8% | 12.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 7.7% | 12.3% |
Demographics Similar to Kiowa and Houma by Disability Age 35 to 64
In terms of disability age 35 to 64, the demographic groups most similar to Kiowa are Lumbee (17.6%, a difference of 1.7%), Yup'ik (16.9%, a difference of 2.5%), Creek (16.9%, a difference of 2.8%), Tohono O'odham (16.7%, a difference of 3.7%), and Tsimshian (16.7%, a difference of 3.8%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Houma are Lumbee (17.6%, a difference of 5.9%), Yup'ik (16.9%, a difference of 10.3%), Creek (16.9%, a difference of 10.7%), Tohono O'odham (16.7%, a difference of 11.6%), and Tsimshian (16.7%, a difference of 11.8%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Disability Age 35 to 64 |
| Cajuns | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 15.3% |
| Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 15.5% |
| Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 15.5% |
| Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 15.6% |
| Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 15.7% |
| Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 15.8% |
| Colville | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 15.8% |
| Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 15.9% |
| Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 15.9% |
| Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 15.9% |
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 16.1% |
| Pima | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 16.1% |
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 16.4% |
| Tsimshian | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 16.7% |
| Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 16.7% |
| Creek | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 16.9% |
| Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 16.9% |
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 17.4% |
| Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #346 | Tragic 17.6% |
| Houma | 0.0 /100 | #347 | Tragic 18.7% |