Swiss vs Immigrants from Southern Europe Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Swiss
Immigrants from Southern Europe
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Swiss
Immigrants from Southern Europe
6.1%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
43.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
181st/ 347
METRIC RANK
6.1%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
58.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
169th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Swiss vs Immigrants from Southern Europe Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 464,822,088 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Swiss and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.384 and weighted average of 6.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 402,703,105 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Southern Europe and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.222 and weighted average of 6.1%, a difference of 0.80%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Swiss | Immigrants from Southern Europe |
Minimum | 0.81% | 0.74% |
Maximum | 26.5% | 22.0% |
Range | 25.7% | 21.2% |
Mean | 7.5% | 7.6% |
Median | 6.3% | 6.3% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.3% | 5.7% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 7.8% | 7.9% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.6% | 2.3% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.6% | 4.1% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.6% | 4.1% |
Demographics Similar to Swiss and Immigrants from Southern Europe by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Swiss are Serbian (6.1%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Nicaragua (6.1%, a difference of 0.040%), Austrian (6.1%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Thailand (6.1%, a difference of 0.050%), and Scandinavian (6.1%, a difference of 0.080%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Southern Europe are Ecuadorian (6.1%, a difference of 0.14%), Immigrants from Oceania (6.1%, a difference of 0.15%), Immigrants from Ecuador (6.1%, a difference of 0.23%), Iraqi (6.1%, a difference of 0.26%), and Nicaraguan (6.1%, a difference of 0.29%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
Nicaraguans | 63.2 /100 | #165 | Good 6.1% |
Iraqis | 62.8 /100 | #166 | Good 6.1% |
Immigrants | Oceania | 60.7 /100 | #167 | Good 6.1% |
Ecuadorians | 60.5 /100 | #168 | Good 6.1% |
Immigrants | Southern Europe | 58.1 /100 | #169 | Average 6.1% |
Immigrants | Ecuador | 53.8 /100 | #170 | Average 6.1% |
Moroccans | 52.6 /100 | #171 | Average 6.1% |
Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 52.2 /100 | #172 | Average 6.1% |
Croatians | 51.2 /100 | #173 | Average 6.1% |
Immigrants | Canada | 50.0 /100 | #174 | Average 6.1% |
Vietnamese | 47.2 /100 | #175 | Average 6.1% |
Immigrants | North America | 45.6 /100 | #176 | Average 6.1% |
Immigrants | England | 45.4 /100 | #177 | Average 6.1% |
Scandinavians | 44.5 /100 | #178 | Average 6.1% |
Austrians | 44.1 /100 | #179 | Average 6.1% |
Immigrants | Nicaragua | 43.9 /100 | #180 | Average 6.1% |
Swiss | 43.1 /100 | #181 | Average 6.1% |
Serbians | 42.8 /100 | #182 | Average 6.1% |
Immigrants | Thailand | 42.2 /100 | #183 | Average 6.1% |
Immigrants | Ghana | 41.2 /100 | #184 | Average 6.1% |
Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 37.2 /100 | #185 | Fair 6.2% |