Swiss vs Immigrants from Guatemala Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Swiss
Immigrants from Guatemala
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Swiss
Immigrants from Guatemala
6.1%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
43.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
181st/ 347
METRIC RANK
6.2%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
31.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
191st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Swiss vs Immigrants from Guatemala Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 464,822,088 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Swiss and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.384 and weighted average of 6.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 377,192,086 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Guatemala and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.165 and weighted average of 6.2%, a difference of 0.63%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Swiss | Immigrants from Guatemala |
| Minimum | 0.81% | 0.59% |
| Maximum | 26.5% | 13.5% |
| Range | 25.7% | 13.0% |
| Mean | 7.5% | 6.2% |
| Median | 6.3% | 6.1% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.3% | 4.7% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 7.8% | 7.0% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.6% | 2.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.6% | 2.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.6% | 2.5% |
Demographics Similar to Swiss and Immigrants from Guatemala by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Swiss are Serbian (6.1%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Nicaragua (6.1%, a difference of 0.040%), Austrian (6.1%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Thailand (6.1%, a difference of 0.050%), and Scandinavian (6.1%, a difference of 0.080%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Guatemala are Immigrants from Western Europe (6.2%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Western Africa (6.2%, a difference of 0.090%), Ukrainian (6.2%, a difference of 0.12%), Guatemalan (6.2%, a difference of 0.12%), and Alaska Native (6.2%, a difference of 0.13%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
| Immigrants | North America | 45.6 /100 | #176 | Average 6.1% |
| Immigrants | England | 45.4 /100 | #177 | Average 6.1% |
| Scandinavians | 44.5 /100 | #178 | Average 6.1% |
| Austrians | 44.1 /100 | #179 | Average 6.1% |
| Immigrants | Nicaragua | 43.9 /100 | #180 | Average 6.1% |
| Swiss | 43.1 /100 | #181 | Average 6.1% |
| Serbians | 42.8 /100 | #182 | Average 6.1% |
| Immigrants | Thailand | 42.2 /100 | #183 | Average 6.1% |
| Immigrants | Ghana | 41.2 /100 | #184 | Average 6.1% |
| Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 37.2 /100 | #185 | Fair 6.2% |
| Europeans | 36.2 /100 | #186 | Fair 6.2% |
| Carpatho Rusyns | 35.3 /100 | #187 | Fair 6.2% |
| British | 34.3 /100 | #188 | Fair 6.2% |
| Ukrainians | 34.0 /100 | #189 | Fair 6.2% |
| Immigrants | Western Africa | 33.4 /100 | #190 | Fair 6.2% |
| Immigrants | Guatemala | 31.9 /100 | #191 | Fair 6.2% |
| Immigrants | Western Europe | 31.6 /100 | #192 | Fair 6.2% |
| Guatemalans | 30.0 /100 | #193 | Fair 6.2% |
| Alaska Natives | 29.8 /100 | #194 | Fair 6.2% |
| Belgians | 28.6 /100 | #195 | Fair 6.2% |
| Malaysians | 28.2 /100 | #196 | Fair 6.2% |