Subsaharan African vs Slavic Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Subsaharan African
Slavic
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Sub-Saharan Africans
Slavs
6.4%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
2.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
233rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
6.4%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
5.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
226th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Subsaharan African vs Slavic Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 507,846,771 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Sub-Saharan Africans and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.307 and weighted average of 6.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 270,841,437 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Slavs and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.378 and weighted average of 6.4%, a difference of 1.1%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Subsaharan African | Slavic |
Minimum | 1.5% | 0.58% |
Maximum | 27.3% | 56.8% |
Range | 25.7% | 56.3% |
Mean | 8.3% | 9.9% |
Median | 6.5% | 7.4% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 6.1% | 6.0% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 8.2% | 10.2% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.1% | 4.2% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.0% | 8.9% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.9% | 8.8% |
Demographics Similar to Sub-Saharan Africans and Slavs by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Sub-Saharan Africans are Immigrants from Liberia (6.4%, a difference of 0.030%), Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac (6.4%, a difference of 0.060%), Hispanic or Latino (6.4%, a difference of 0.060%), Dutch (6.4%, a difference of 0.21%), and Immigrants from Germany (6.4%, a difference of 0.30%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Slavs are Honduran (6.3%, a difference of 0.27%), Cuban (6.4%, a difference of 0.33%), Portuguese (6.4%, a difference of 0.34%), Czechoslovakian (6.4%, a difference of 0.39%), and Liberian (6.3%, a difference of 0.44%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
Indonesians | 9.9 /100 | #219 | Tragic 6.3% |
Immigrants | Albania | 9.6 /100 | #220 | Tragic 6.3% |
Hungarians | 9.6 /100 | #221 | Tragic 6.3% |
German Russians | 9.4 /100 | #222 | Tragic 6.3% |
Immigrants | Honduras | 7.6 /100 | #223 | Tragic 6.3% |
Liberians | 7.1 /100 | #224 | Tragic 6.3% |
Hondurans | 6.3 /100 | #225 | Tragic 6.3% |
Slavs | 5.1 /100 | #226 | Tragic 6.4% |
Cubans | 4.0 /100 | #227 | Tragic 6.4% |
Portuguese | 4.0 /100 | #228 | Tragic 6.4% |
Czechoslovakians | 3.8 /100 | #229 | Tragic 6.4% |
Mexicans | 3.5 /100 | #230 | Tragic 6.4% |
Panamanians | 3.1 /100 | #231 | Tragic 6.4% |
Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs | 2.4 /100 | #232 | Tragic 6.4% |
Sub-Saharan Africans | 2.3 /100 | #233 | Tragic 6.4% |
Immigrants | Liberia | 2.3 /100 | #234 | Tragic 6.4% |
Hispanics or Latinos | 2.2 /100 | #235 | Tragic 6.4% |
Dutch | 2.0 /100 | #236 | Tragic 6.4% |
Immigrants | Germany | 1.8 /100 | #237 | Tragic 6.4% |
Haitians | 1.8 /100 | #238 | Tragic 6.4% |
Senegalese | 1.7 /100 | #239 | Tragic 6.4% |