Immigrants from Laos vs Slavic Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Laos
Slavic
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Laos
Slavs
6.3%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
13.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
210th/ 347
METRIC RANK
6.4%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
5.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
226th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Laos vs Slavic Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 201,465,206 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Laos and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.219 and weighted average of 6.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 270,841,437 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Slavs and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.378 and weighted average of 6.4%, a difference of 1.3%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Laos | Slavic |
Minimum | 1.4% | 0.58% |
Maximum | 13.9% | 56.8% |
Range | 12.5% | 56.3% |
Mean | 6.9% | 9.9% |
Median | 6.5% | 7.4% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.8% | 6.0% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 7.8% | 10.2% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.0% | 4.2% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.4% | 8.9% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.4% | 8.8% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Laos and Slavs by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Laos are Immigrants from Iraq (6.3%, a difference of 0.080%), Bangladeshi (6.3%, a difference of 0.10%), Samoan (6.3%, a difference of 0.14%), Mexican American Indian (6.3%, a difference of 0.15%), and Japanese (6.3%, a difference of 0.15%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Slavs are Honduran (6.3%, a difference of 0.27%), Cuban (6.4%, a difference of 0.33%), Portuguese (6.4%, a difference of 0.34%), Liberian (6.3%, a difference of 0.44%), and Immigrants from Honduras (6.3%, a difference of 0.54%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
Bangladeshis | 14.2 /100 | #208 | Poor 6.3% |
Immigrants | Iraq | 14.0 /100 | #209 | Poor 6.3% |
Immigrants | Laos | 13.2 /100 | #210 | Poor 6.3% |
Samoans | 12.1 /100 | #211 | Poor 6.3% |
Mexican American Indians | 12.0 /100 | #212 | Poor 6.3% |
Japanese | 12.0 /100 | #213 | Poor 6.3% |
Immigrants | Mexico | 11.0 /100 | #214 | Poor 6.3% |
Immigrants | Latin America | 11.0 /100 | #215 | Poor 6.3% |
Canadians | 10.9 /100 | #216 | Poor 6.3% |
Yugoslavians | 10.9 /100 | #217 | Poor 6.3% |
Guamanians/Chamorros | 10.6 /100 | #218 | Poor 6.3% |
Indonesians | 9.9 /100 | #219 | Tragic 6.3% |
Immigrants | Albania | 9.6 /100 | #220 | Tragic 6.3% |
Hungarians | 9.6 /100 | #221 | Tragic 6.3% |
German Russians | 9.4 /100 | #222 | Tragic 6.3% |
Immigrants | Honduras | 7.6 /100 | #223 | Tragic 6.3% |
Liberians | 7.1 /100 | #224 | Tragic 6.3% |
Hondurans | 6.3 /100 | #225 | Tragic 6.3% |
Slavs | 5.1 /100 | #226 | Tragic 6.4% |
Cubans | 4.0 /100 | #227 | Tragic 6.4% |
Portuguese | 4.0 /100 | #228 | Tragic 6.4% |