Sri Lankan vs Zimbabwean Female Disability
COMPARE
Sri Lankan
Zimbabwean
Female Disability
Female Disability Comparison
Sri Lankans
Zimbabweans
11.4%
FEMALE DISABILITY
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
62nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
11.3%
FEMALE DISABILITY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
48th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Sri Lankan vs Zimbabwean Female Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 440,479,567 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Sri Lankans and percentage of females with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.474 and weighted average of 11.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 69,206,785 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Zimbabweans and percentage of females with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.196 and weighted average of 11.3%, a difference of 1.3%.
Female Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Sri Lankan | Zimbabwean |
| Minimum | 2.6% | 5.7% |
| Maximum | 62.5% | 20.3% |
| Range | 59.9% | 14.6% |
| Mean | 12.9% | 11.3% |
| Median | 11.2% | 11.3% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 9.8% | 9.5% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 12.4% | 12.2% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.5% | 2.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 8.9% | 3.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 8.9% | 3.1% |
Demographics Similar to Sri Lankans and Zimbabweans by Female Disability
In terms of female disability, the demographic groups most similar to Sri Lankans are Immigrants from France (11.4%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Colombia (11.4%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Bulgaria (11.4%, a difference of 0.15%), Immigrants from El Salvador (11.4%, a difference of 0.17%), and Immigrants from South America (11.4%, a difference of 0.19%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Zimbabweans are Jordanian (11.3%, a difference of 0.0%), Tongan (11.3%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Nepal (11.3%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Sweden (11.3%, a difference of 0.070%), and Inupiat (11.3%, a difference of 0.24%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Disability |
| Immigrants | Sweden | 100.0 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 11.3% |
| Immigrants | Nepal | 100.0 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 11.3% |
| Jordanians | 100.0 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 11.3% |
| Zimbabweans | 100.0 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 11.3% |
| Tongans | 100.0 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 11.3% |
| Inupiat | 100.0 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 11.3% |
| Immigrants | Belgium | 100.0 /100 | #51 | Exceptional 11.3% |
| Immigrants | Peru | 99.9 /100 | #52 | Exceptional 11.3% |
| Immigrants | Saudi Arabia | 99.9 /100 | #53 | Exceptional 11.3% |
| Peruvians | 99.9 /100 | #54 | Exceptional 11.3% |
| Bulgarians | 99.9 /100 | #55 | Exceptional 11.3% |
| Taiwanese | 99.9 /100 | #56 | Exceptional 11.4% |
| South Americans | 99.9 /100 | #57 | Exceptional 11.4% |
| Laotians | 99.9 /100 | #58 | Exceptional 11.4% |
| Immigrants | Spain | 99.9 /100 | #59 | Exceptional 11.4% |
| Immigrants | Bulgaria | 99.9 /100 | #60 | Exceptional 11.4% |
| Immigrants | France | 99.9 /100 | #61 | Exceptional 11.4% |
| Sri Lankans | 99.9 /100 | #62 | Exceptional 11.4% |
| Immigrants | Colombia | 99.9 /100 | #63 | Exceptional 11.4% |
| Immigrants | El Salvador | 99.9 /100 | #64 | Exceptional 11.4% |
| Immigrants | South America | 99.9 /100 | #65 | Exceptional 11.4% |