Immigrants from Egypt vs Zimbabwean Female Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Egypt
Zimbabwean
Female Disability
Female Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Egypt
Zimbabweans
11.1%
FEMALE DISABILITY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
33rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
11.3%
FEMALE DISABILITY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
48th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Egypt vs Zimbabwean Female Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 245,491,192 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Egypt and percentage of females with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.092 and weighted average of 11.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 69,206,785 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Zimbabweans and percentage of females with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.196 and weighted average of 11.3%, a difference of 1.2%.
Female Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Egypt | Zimbabwean |
| Minimum | 3.5% | 5.7% |
| Maximum | 21.8% | 20.3% |
| Range | 18.3% | 14.6% |
| Mean | 11.3% | 11.3% |
| Median | 10.6% | 11.3% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 9.7% | 9.5% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 12.8% | 12.2% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.2% | 2.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.2% | 3.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.1% | 3.1% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Egypt and Zimbabweans by Female Disability
In terms of female disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Egypt are Immigrants from Australia (11.1%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Kuwait (11.1%, a difference of 0.25%), Immigrants from Indonesia (11.2%, a difference of 0.25%), Turkish (11.1%, a difference of 0.35%), and Immigrants from Japan (11.2%, a difference of 0.40%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Zimbabweans are Jordanian (11.3%, a difference of 0.0%), Tongan (11.3%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Nepal (11.3%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Sweden (11.3%, a difference of 0.070%), and Cambodian (11.3%, a difference of 0.11%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Disability |
| Turks | 100.0 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 11.1% |
| Immigrants | Kuwait | 100.0 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 11.1% |
| Immigrants | Australia | 100.0 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 11.1% |
| Immigrants | Egypt | 100.0 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 11.1% |
| Immigrants | Indonesia | 100.0 /100 | #34 | Exceptional 11.2% |
| Immigrants | Japan | 100.0 /100 | #35 | Exceptional 11.2% |
| Cypriots | 100.0 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 11.2% |
| Ethiopians | 100.0 /100 | #37 | Exceptional 11.2% |
| Immigrants | Ethiopia | 100.0 /100 | #38 | Exceptional 11.2% |
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 100.0 /100 | #39 | Exceptional 11.2% |
| Mongolians | 100.0 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 11.2% |
| Paraguayans | 100.0 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 11.2% |
| Israelis | 100.0 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 11.2% |
| Afghans | 100.0 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 11.2% |
| Cambodians | 100.0 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 11.3% |
| Immigrants | Sweden | 100.0 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 11.3% |
| Immigrants | Nepal | 100.0 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 11.3% |
| Jordanians | 100.0 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 11.3% |
| Zimbabweans | 100.0 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 11.3% |
| Tongans | 100.0 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 11.3% |
| Inupiat | 100.0 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 11.3% |