Spanish vs Pima Hearing Disability
COMPARE
Spanish
Pima
Hearing Disability
Hearing Disability Comparison
Spanish
Pima
3.7%
HEARING DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
287th/ 347
METRIC RANK
3.7%
HEARING DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
296th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Spanish vs Pima Hearing Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 421,995,316 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Spanish and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.356 and weighted average of 3.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 61,536,530 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Pima and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.125 and weighted average of 3.7%, a difference of 1.7%.
Hearing Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Spanish | Pima |
| Minimum | 0.21% | 1.0% |
| Maximum | 35.7% | 13.0% |
| Range | 35.5% | 12.0% |
| Mean | 8.4% | 5.4% |
| Median | 6.5% | 4.7% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.1% | 3.9% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 9.6% | 6.6% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.5% | 2.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.8% | 2.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.8% | 2.6% |
Demographics Similar to Spanish and Pima by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Spanish are Delaware (3.6%, a difference of 0.24%), Sioux (3.6%, a difference of 0.28%), Immigrants from Micronesia (3.6%, a difference of 0.38%), Irish (3.7%, a difference of 0.57%), and Chinese (3.7%, a difference of 0.78%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Pima are Immigrants from the Azores (3.7%, a difference of 0.070%), Welsh (3.7%, a difference of 0.13%), Celtic (3.7%, a difference of 0.26%), Iroquois (3.7%, a difference of 0.39%), and German (3.7%, a difference of 0.54%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
| Scandinavians | 0.0 /100 | #281 | Tragic 3.6% |
| Swedes | 0.0 /100 | #282 | Tragic 3.6% |
| Blackfeet | 0.0 /100 | #283 | Tragic 3.6% |
| Immigrants | Micronesia | 0.0 /100 | #284 | Tragic 3.6% |
| Sioux | 0.0 /100 | #285 | Tragic 3.6% |
| Delaware | 0.0 /100 | #286 | Tragic 3.6% |
| Spanish | 0.0 /100 | #287 | Tragic 3.7% |
| Irish | 0.0 /100 | #288 | Tragic 3.7% |
| Chinese | 0.0 /100 | #289 | Tragic 3.7% |
| Whites/Caucasians | 0.0 /100 | #290 | Tragic 3.7% |
| Finns | 0.0 /100 | #291 | Tragic 3.7% |
| Native Hawaiians | 0.0 /100 | #292 | Tragic 3.7% |
| Norwegians | 0.0 /100 | #293 | Tragic 3.7% |
| Iroquois | 0.0 /100 | #294 | Tragic 3.7% |
| Welsh | 0.0 /100 | #295 | Tragic 3.7% |
| Pima | 0.0 /100 | #296 | Tragic 3.7% |
| Immigrants | Azores | 0.0 /100 | #297 | Tragic 3.7% |
| Celtics | 0.0 /100 | #298 | Tragic 3.7% |
| Germans | 0.0 /100 | #299 | Tragic 3.7% |
| Scottish | 0.0 /100 | #300 | Tragic 3.7% |
| Pennsylvania Germans | 0.0 /100 | #301 | Tragic 3.7% |