Blackfeet vs Pima Hearing Disability
COMPARE
Blackfeet
Pima
Hearing Disability
Hearing Disability Comparison
Blackfeet
Pima
3.6%
HEARING DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
283rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
3.7%
HEARING DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
296th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Blackfeet vs Pima Hearing Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 309,445,553 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Blackfeet and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.013 and weighted average of 3.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 61,536,530 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Pima and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.125 and weighted average of 3.7%, a difference of 2.5%.
Hearing Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Blackfeet | Pima |
Minimum | 0.91% | 1.0% |
Maximum | 25.6% | 13.0% |
Range | 24.7% | 12.0% |
Mean | 7.4% | 5.4% |
Median | 6.5% | 4.7% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.2% | 3.9% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 8.5% | 6.6% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.3% | 2.7% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.6% | 2.6% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.5% | 2.6% |
Demographics Similar to Blackfeet and Pima by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Blackfeet are Swedish (3.6%, a difference of 0.25%), Scandinavian (3.6%, a difference of 0.34%), French American Indian (3.6%, a difference of 0.40%), Slovak (3.6%, a difference of 0.46%), and Immigrants from Micronesia (3.6%, a difference of 0.47%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Pima are Immigrants from the Azores (3.7%, a difference of 0.070%), Welsh (3.7%, a difference of 0.13%), Celtic (3.7%, a difference of 0.26%), Iroquois (3.7%, a difference of 0.39%), and German (3.7%, a difference of 0.54%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
Slovaks | 0.0 /100 | #279 | Tragic 3.6% |
French American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #280 | Tragic 3.6% |
Scandinavians | 0.0 /100 | #281 | Tragic 3.6% |
Swedes | 0.0 /100 | #282 | Tragic 3.6% |
Blackfeet | 0.0 /100 | #283 | Tragic 3.6% |
Immigrants | Micronesia | 0.0 /100 | #284 | Tragic 3.6% |
Sioux | 0.0 /100 | #285 | Tragic 3.6% |
Delaware | 0.0 /100 | #286 | Tragic 3.6% |
Spanish | 0.0 /100 | #287 | Tragic 3.7% |
Irish | 0.0 /100 | #288 | Tragic 3.7% |
Chinese | 0.0 /100 | #289 | Tragic 3.7% |
Whites/Caucasians | 0.0 /100 | #290 | Tragic 3.7% |
Finns | 0.0 /100 | #291 | Tragic 3.7% |
Native Hawaiians | 0.0 /100 | #292 | Tragic 3.7% |
Norwegians | 0.0 /100 | #293 | Tragic 3.7% |
Iroquois | 0.0 /100 | #294 | Tragic 3.7% |
Welsh | 0.0 /100 | #295 | Tragic 3.7% |
Pima | 0.0 /100 | #296 | Tragic 3.7% |
Immigrants | Azores | 0.0 /100 | #297 | Tragic 3.7% |
Celtics | 0.0 /100 | #298 | Tragic 3.7% |
Germans | 0.0 /100 | #299 | Tragic 3.7% |