Scandinavian vs Uruguayan Vision Disability
COMPARE
Scandinavian
Uruguayan
Vision Disability
Vision Disability Comparison
Scandinavians
Uruguayans
2.2%
VISION DISABILITY
50.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
173rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
2.2%
VISION DISABILITY
42.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
180th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Scandinavian vs Uruguayan Vision Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 471,900,698 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Scandinavians and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.483 and weighted average of 2.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 144,772,408 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Uruguayans and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.158 and weighted average of 2.2%, a difference of 0.47%.
Vision Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Scandinavian | Uruguayan |
| Minimum | 0.66% | 0.80% |
| Maximum | 22.0% | 6.1% |
| Range | 21.3% | 5.3% |
| Mean | 4.2% | 2.4% |
| Median | 2.7% | 2.1% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.1% | 1.8% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 5.2% | 2.7% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.1% | 0.93% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.7% | 1.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.7% | 1.3% |
Demographics Similar to Scandinavians and Uruguayans by Vision Disability
In terms of vision disability, the demographic groups most similar to Scandinavians are Northern European (2.2%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Canada (2.2%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Fiji (2.2%, a difference of 0.15%), Yugoslavian (2.2%, a difference of 0.22%), and Slavic (2.2%, a difference of 0.26%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Uruguayans are Immigrants from Western Europe (2.2%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from North America (2.2%, a difference of 0.12%), Costa Rican (2.2%, a difference of 0.13%), Immigrants from Oceania (2.2%, a difference of 0.16%), and Slavic (2.2%, a difference of 0.21%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Vision Disability |
| Immigrants | England | 62.8 /100 | #166 | Good 2.1% |
| Immigrants | Africa | 62.6 /100 | #167 | Good 2.1% |
| Brazilians | 62.2 /100 | #168 | Good 2.1% |
| South American Indians | 57.4 /100 | #169 | Average 2.2% |
| Swiss | 55.7 /100 | #170 | Average 2.2% |
| Lebanese | 54.3 /100 | #171 | Average 2.2% |
| Northern Europeans | 50.1 /100 | #172 | Average 2.2% |
| Scandinavians | 50.0 /100 | #173 | Average 2.2% |
| Immigrants | Canada | 50.0 /100 | #174 | Average 2.2% |
| Immigrants | Fiji | 47.6 /100 | #175 | Average 2.2% |
| Yugoslavians | 46.5 /100 | #176 | Average 2.2% |
| Slavs | 46.0 /100 | #177 | Average 2.2% |
| Immigrants | Oceania | 45.1 /100 | #178 | Average 2.2% |
| Immigrants | North America | 44.5 /100 | #179 | Average 2.2% |
| Uruguayans | 42.7 /100 | #180 | Average 2.2% |
| Immigrants | Western Europe | 41.1 /100 | #181 | Average 2.2% |
| Costa Ricans | 40.7 /100 | #182 | Average 2.2% |
| Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 37.9 /100 | #183 | Fair 2.2% |
| Moroccans | 35.4 /100 | #184 | Fair 2.2% |
| Immigrants | Middle Africa | 33.5 /100 | #185 | Fair 2.2% |
| Native Hawaiians | 33.3 /100 | #186 | Fair 2.2% |