Brazilian vs Uruguayan Vision Disability
COMPARE
Brazilian
Uruguayan
Vision Disability
Vision Disability Comparison
Brazilians
Uruguayans
2.1%
VISION DISABILITY
62.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
168th/ 347
METRIC RANK
2.2%
VISION DISABILITY
42.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
180th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Brazilian vs Uruguayan Vision Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 323,719,841 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Brazilians and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.324 and weighted average of 2.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 144,772,408 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Uruguayans and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.158 and weighted average of 2.2%, a difference of 1.3%.
Vision Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Brazilian | Uruguayan |
Minimum | 0.54% | 0.80% |
Maximum | 8.2% | 6.1% |
Range | 7.7% | 5.3% |
Mean | 2.5% | 2.4% |
Median | 2.1% | 2.1% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 1.7% | 1.8% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 2.8% | 2.7% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.1% | 0.93% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.4% | 1.3% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.4% | 1.3% |
Demographics Similar to Brazilians and Uruguayans by Vision Disability
In terms of vision disability, the demographic groups most similar to Brazilians are Immigrants from Africa (2.1%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from England (2.1%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Iraq (2.1%, a difference of 0.18%), Immigrants from Bangladesh (2.1%, a difference of 0.23%), and South American Indian (2.2%, a difference of 0.32%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Uruguayans are Immigrants from Western Europe (2.2%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from North America (2.2%, a difference of 0.12%), Costa Rican (2.2%, a difference of 0.13%), Immigrants from Oceania (2.2%, a difference of 0.16%), and Slavic (2.2%, a difference of 0.21%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Vision Disability |
Immigrants | Bangladesh | 65.5 /100 | #164 | Good 2.1% |
Immigrants | Iraq | 64.8 /100 | #165 | Good 2.1% |
Immigrants | England | 62.8 /100 | #166 | Good 2.1% |
Immigrants | Africa | 62.6 /100 | #167 | Good 2.1% |
Brazilians | 62.2 /100 | #168 | Good 2.1% |
South American Indians | 57.4 /100 | #169 | Average 2.2% |
Swiss | 55.7 /100 | #170 | Average 2.2% |
Lebanese | 54.3 /100 | #171 | Average 2.2% |
Northern Europeans | 50.1 /100 | #172 | Average 2.2% |
Scandinavians | 50.0 /100 | #173 | Average 2.2% |
Immigrants | Canada | 50.0 /100 | #174 | Average 2.2% |
Immigrants | Fiji | 47.6 /100 | #175 | Average 2.2% |
Yugoslavians | 46.5 /100 | #176 | Average 2.2% |
Slavs | 46.0 /100 | #177 | Average 2.2% |
Immigrants | Oceania | 45.1 /100 | #178 | Average 2.2% |
Immigrants | North America | 44.5 /100 | #179 | Average 2.2% |
Uruguayans | 42.7 /100 | #180 | Average 2.2% |
Immigrants | Western Europe | 41.1 /100 | #181 | Average 2.2% |
Costa Ricans | 40.7 /100 | #182 | Average 2.2% |
Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 37.9 /100 | #183 | Fair 2.2% |
Moroccans | 35.4 /100 | #184 | Fair 2.2% |