Polish vs Osage Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Polish
Osage
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Poles
Osage
6.2%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
26.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
197th/ 347
METRIC RANK
7.4%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
322nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Polish vs Osage Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 560,051,234 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Poles and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.570 and weighted average of 6.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 91,795,743 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Osage and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.284 and weighted average of 7.4%, a difference of 19.2%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Polish | Osage |
| Minimum | 2.2% | 1.5% |
| Maximum | 47.7% | 25.0% |
| Range | 45.5% | 23.5% |
| Mean | 9.1% | 10.5% |
| Median | 6.6% | 9.5% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 6.0% | 7.3% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 8.8% | 12.8% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.8% | 5.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 7.4% | 4.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 7.3% | 4.8% |
Similar Demographics by Ambulatory Disability
Demographics Similar to Poles by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Poles are Malaysian (6.2%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from Bangladesh (6.2%, a difference of 0.12%), Belgian (6.2%, a difference of 0.15%), Alaska Native (6.2%, a difference of 0.23%), and Guatemalan (6.2%, a difference of 0.24%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
| Immigrants | Western Africa | 33.4 /100 | #190 | Fair 6.2% |
| Immigrants | Guatemala | 31.9 /100 | #191 | Fair 6.2% |
| Immigrants | Western Europe | 31.6 /100 | #192 | Fair 6.2% |
| Guatemalans | 30.0 /100 | #193 | Fair 6.2% |
| Alaska Natives | 29.8 /100 | #194 | Fair 6.2% |
| Belgians | 28.6 /100 | #195 | Fair 6.2% |
| Malaysians | 28.2 /100 | #196 | Fair 6.2% |
| Poles | 26.3 /100 | #197 | Fair 6.2% |
| Immigrants | Bangladesh | 24.6 /100 | #198 | Fair 6.2% |
| Italians | 22.6 /100 | #199 | Fair 6.2% |
| Immigrants | Cambodia | 21.5 /100 | #200 | Fair 6.2% |
| Immigrants | Central America | 20.1 /100 | #201 | Fair 6.2% |
| Albanians | 19.7 /100 | #202 | Poor 6.2% |
| Immigrants | Ukraine | 18.4 /100 | #203 | Poor 6.2% |
| Immigrants | Congo | 18.2 /100 | #204 | Poor 6.2% |
Demographics Similar to Osage by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Osage are Apache (7.4%, a difference of 0.14%), American (7.4%, a difference of 0.28%), Potawatomi (7.3%, a difference of 0.95%), Navajo (7.5%, a difference of 1.6%), and Comanche (7.5%, a difference of 1.7%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
| Shoshone | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 7.1% |
| Immigrants | Dominican Republic | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 7.1% |
| Central American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 7.2% |
| Ottawa | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 7.2% |
| Dominicans | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 7.2% |
| Potawatomi | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 7.3% |
| Apache | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 7.4% |
| Osage | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 7.4% |
| Americans | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 7.4% |
| Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 7.5% |
| Comanche | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 7.5% |
| Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #326 | Tragic 7.5% |
| Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #327 | Tragic 7.5% |
| Hopi | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 7.6% |
| Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 7.6% |