Polish vs Canadian Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Polish
Canadian
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Poles
Canadians
6.2%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
26.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
197th/ 347
METRIC RANK
6.3%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
10.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
216th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Polish vs Canadian Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 560,051,234 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Poles and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.570 and weighted average of 6.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 437,391,973 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Canadians and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.333 and weighted average of 6.3%, a difference of 1.4%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Polish | Canadian |
| Minimum | 2.2% | 1.0% |
| Maximum | 47.7% | 38.9% |
| Range | 45.5% | 37.8% |
| Mean | 9.1% | 11.4% |
| Median | 6.6% | 7.7% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 6.0% | 6.0% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 8.8% | 14.6% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.8% | 8.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 7.4% | 9.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 7.3% | 9.6% |
Demographics Similar to Poles and Canadians by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Poles are Malaysian (6.2%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from Bangladesh (6.2%, a difference of 0.12%), Italian (6.2%, a difference of 0.26%), Immigrants from Cambodia (6.2%, a difference of 0.35%), and Immigrants from Central America (6.2%, a difference of 0.46%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Canadians are Immigrants from Latin America (6.3%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Mexico (6.3%, a difference of 0.020%), Mexican American Indian (6.3%, a difference of 0.14%), Japanese (6.3%, a difference of 0.14%), and Samoan (6.3%, a difference of 0.15%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
| Malaysians | 28.2 /100 | #196 | Fair 6.2% |
| Poles | 26.3 /100 | #197 | Fair 6.2% |
| Immigrants | Bangladesh | 24.6 /100 | #198 | Fair 6.2% |
| Italians | 22.6 /100 | #199 | Fair 6.2% |
| Immigrants | Cambodia | 21.5 /100 | #200 | Fair 6.2% |
| Immigrants | Central America | 20.1 /100 | #201 | Fair 6.2% |
| Albanians | 19.7 /100 | #202 | Poor 6.2% |
| Immigrants | Ukraine | 18.4 /100 | #203 | Poor 6.2% |
| Immigrants | Congo | 18.2 /100 | #204 | Poor 6.2% |
| Slovenes | 18.0 /100 | #205 | Poor 6.2% |
| Finns | 17.2 /100 | #206 | Poor 6.2% |
| Alsatians | 15.1 /100 | #207 | Poor 6.3% |
| Bangladeshis | 14.2 /100 | #208 | Poor 6.3% |
| Immigrants | Iraq | 14.0 /100 | #209 | Poor 6.3% |
| Immigrants | Laos | 13.2 /100 | #210 | Poor 6.3% |
| Samoans | 12.1 /100 | #211 | Poor 6.3% |
| Mexican American Indians | 12.0 /100 | #212 | Poor 6.3% |
| Japanese | 12.0 /100 | #213 | Poor 6.3% |
| Immigrants | Mexico | 11.0 /100 | #214 | Poor 6.3% |
| Immigrants | Latin America | 11.0 /100 | #215 | Poor 6.3% |
| Canadians | 10.9 /100 | #216 | Poor 6.3% |