Pennsylvania German vs Immigrants from Grenada Vision Disability
COMPARE
Pennsylvania German
Immigrants from Grenada
Vision Disability
Vision Disability Comparison
Pennsylvania Germans
Immigrants from Grenada
2.2%
VISION DISABILITY
14.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
206th/ 347
METRIC RANK
2.2%
VISION DISABILITY
23.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
196th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Pennsylvania German vs Immigrants from Grenada Vision Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 233,923,332 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Pennsylvania Germans and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.479 and weighted average of 2.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 67,180,438 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Grenada and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.010 and weighted average of 2.2%, a difference of 0.88%.
Vision Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Pennsylvania German | Immigrants from Grenada |
Minimum | 0.20% | 0.16% |
Maximum | 15.9% | 5.1% |
Range | 15.7% | 4.9% |
Mean | 2.6% | 2.3% |
Median | 1.9% | 2.2% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 1.4% | 1.4% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 2.6% | 2.7% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.2% | 1.3% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.8% | 1.1% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.7% | 1.1% |
Demographics Similar to Pennsylvania Germans and Immigrants from Grenada by Vision Disability
In terms of vision disability, the demographic groups most similar to Pennsylvania Germans are Immigrants from Nigeria (2.2%, a difference of 0.13%), Samoan (2.2%, a difference of 0.14%), German (2.2%, a difference of 0.14%), Immigrants from Guyana (2.2%, a difference of 0.17%), and Immigrants from Brazil (2.2%, a difference of 0.18%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Grenada are Immigrants (2.2%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Barbados (2.2%, a difference of 0.070%), Ghanaian (2.2%, a difference of 0.11%), Czechoslovakian (2.2%, a difference of 0.13%), and British (2.2%, a difference of 0.17%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Vision Disability |
Canadians | 25.8 /100 | #191 | Fair 2.2% |
Europeans | 25.7 /100 | #192 | Fair 2.2% |
British | 25.1 /100 | #193 | Fair 2.2% |
Immigrants | Barbados | 24.0 /100 | #194 | Fair 2.2% |
Immigrants | Immigrants | 23.7 /100 | #195 | Fair 2.2% |
Immigrants | Grenada | 23.1 /100 | #196 | Fair 2.2% |
Ghanaians | 21.8 /100 | #197 | Fair 2.2% |
Czechoslovakians | 21.6 /100 | #198 | Fair 2.2% |
Immigrants | El Salvador | 21.0 /100 | #199 | Fair 2.2% |
Immigrants | Thailand | 20.1 /100 | #200 | Fair 2.2% |
Slovaks | 18.8 /100 | #201 | Poor 2.2% |
Immigrants | Zaire | 18.0 /100 | #202 | Poor 2.2% |
Dutch | 17.1 /100 | #203 | Poor 2.2% |
Immigrants | Guyana | 15.9 /100 | #204 | Poor 2.2% |
Samoans | 15.7 /100 | #205 | Poor 2.2% |
Pennsylvania Germans | 14.5 /100 | #206 | Poor 2.2% |
Immigrants | Nigeria | 13.5 /100 | #207 | Poor 2.2% |
Germans | 13.4 /100 | #208 | Poor 2.2% |
Immigrants | Brazil | 13.1 /100 | #209 | Poor 2.2% |
Immigrants | Uruguay | 11.5 /100 | #210 | Poor 2.2% |
Indonesians | 9.5 /100 | #211 | Tragic 2.2% |