Immigrants from Western Asia vs Immigrants from Grenada Vision Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Western Asia
Immigrants from Grenada
Vision Disability
Vision Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Western Asia
Immigrants from Grenada
2.0%
VISION DISABILITY
97.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
83rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
2.2%
VISION DISABILITY
23.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
196th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Western Asia vs Immigrants from Grenada Vision Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 404,140,331 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Western Asia and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.328 and weighted average of 2.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 67,180,438 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Grenada and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.010 and weighted average of 2.2%, a difference of 8.1%.
Vision Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Western Asia | Immigrants from Grenada |
Minimum | 1.3% | 0.16% |
Maximum | 12.5% | 5.1% |
Range | 11.2% | 4.9% |
Mean | 2.4% | 2.3% |
Median | 2.0% | 2.2% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 1.8% | 1.4% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 2.4% | 2.7% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 0.59% | 1.3% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.5% | 1.1% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.5% | 1.1% |
Similar Demographics by Vision Disability
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Western Asia by Vision Disability
In terms of vision disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Western Asia are Immigrants from Poland (2.0%, a difference of 0.080%), Soviet Union (2.0%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Latvia (2.0%, a difference of 0.12%), Lithuanian (2.0%, a difference of 0.17%), and Chinese (2.0%, a difference of 0.17%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Vision Disability |
Paraguayans | 98.3 /100 | #76 | Exceptional 2.0% |
Immigrants | Jordan | 98.3 /100 | #77 | Exceptional 2.0% |
Immigrants | Eastern Europe | 98.3 /100 | #78 | Exceptional 2.0% |
Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs | 98.1 /100 | #79 | Exceptional 2.0% |
Lithuanians | 97.7 /100 | #80 | Exceptional 2.0% |
Soviet Union | 97.6 /100 | #81 | Exceptional 2.0% |
Immigrants | Poland | 97.6 /100 | #82 | Exceptional 2.0% |
Immigrants | Western Asia | 97.5 /100 | #83 | Exceptional 2.0% |
Immigrants | Latvia | 97.3 /100 | #84 | Exceptional 2.0% |
Chinese | 97.2 /100 | #85 | Exceptional 2.0% |
Immigrants | Moldova | 97.2 /100 | #86 | Exceptional 2.0% |
Immigrants | Switzerland | 97.0 /100 | #87 | Exceptional 2.0% |
Norwegians | 97.0 /100 | #88 | Exceptional 2.0% |
Immigrants | Eastern Africa | 97.0 /100 | #89 | Exceptional 2.0% |
Immigrants | Lebanon | 96.7 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 2.1% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Grenada by Vision Disability
In terms of vision disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Grenada are Immigrants (2.2%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Barbados (2.2%, a difference of 0.070%), Ghanaian (2.2%, a difference of 0.11%), Czechoslovakian (2.2%, a difference of 0.13%), and British (2.2%, a difference of 0.17%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Vision Disability |
Salvadorans | 27.4 /100 | #189 | Fair 2.2% |
Immigrants | Costa Rica | 26.1 /100 | #190 | Fair 2.2% |
Canadians | 25.8 /100 | #191 | Fair 2.2% |
Europeans | 25.7 /100 | #192 | Fair 2.2% |
British | 25.1 /100 | #193 | Fair 2.2% |
Immigrants | Barbados | 24.0 /100 | #194 | Fair 2.2% |
Immigrants | Immigrants | 23.7 /100 | #195 | Fair 2.2% |
Immigrants | Grenada | 23.1 /100 | #196 | Fair 2.2% |
Ghanaians | 21.8 /100 | #197 | Fair 2.2% |
Czechoslovakians | 21.6 /100 | #198 | Fair 2.2% |
Immigrants | El Salvador | 21.0 /100 | #199 | Fair 2.2% |
Immigrants | Thailand | 20.1 /100 | #200 | Fair 2.2% |
Slovaks | 18.8 /100 | #201 | Poor 2.2% |
Immigrants | Zaire | 18.0 /100 | #202 | Poor 2.2% |
Dutch | 17.1 /100 | #203 | Poor 2.2% |