Malaysian vs Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Hearing Disability
COMPARE
Malaysian
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia
Hearing Disability
Hearing Disability Comparison
Malaysians
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia
3.2%
HEARING DISABILITY
6.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
220th/ 347
METRIC RANK
3.1%
HEARING DISABILITY
15.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
204th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Malaysian vs Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Hearing Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 226,034,650 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Malaysians and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.244 and weighted average of 3.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 195,448,522 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.509 and weighted average of 3.1%, a difference of 2.2%.
Hearing Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Malaysian | Immigrants from Czechoslovakia |
Minimum | 0.43% | 0.83% |
Maximum | 11.0% | 13.9% |
Range | 10.6% | 13.0% |
Mean | 4.1% | 4.7% |
Median | 3.4% | 3.7% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 3.0% | 2.9% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 4.8% | 5.7% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.7% | 2.8% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.9% | 2.8% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.9% | 2.8% |
Demographics Similar to Malaysians and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Malaysians are Immigrants from Laos (3.2%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Oceania (3.2%, a difference of 0.040%), New Zealander (3.2%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Northern Europe (3.2%, a difference of 0.12%), and Russian (3.2%, a difference of 0.16%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Czechoslovakia are Alsatian (3.1%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Denmark (3.1%, a difference of 0.050%), Eastern European (3.1%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Thailand (3.1%, a difference of 0.090%), and Hispanic or Latino (3.1%, a difference of 0.13%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
Immigrants | Thailand | 16.4 /100 | #202 | Poor 3.1% |
Immigrants | Denmark | 16.2 /100 | #203 | Poor 3.1% |
Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 15.9 /100 | #204 | Poor 3.1% |
Alsatians | 15.9 /100 | #205 | Poor 3.1% |
Eastern Europeans | 15.5 /100 | #206 | Poor 3.1% |
Hispanics or Latinos | 15.1 /100 | #207 | Poor 3.1% |
Immigrants | Latvia | 12.7 /100 | #208 | Poor 3.1% |
Immigrants | Hungary | 12.5 /100 | #209 | Poor 3.1% |
Cape Verdeans | 12.2 /100 | #210 | Poor 3.1% |
Romanians | 12.1 /100 | #211 | Poor 3.1% |
Pakistanis | 11.1 /100 | #212 | Poor 3.1% |
Immigrants | Iraq | 10.5 /100 | #213 | Poor 3.1% |
Australians | 8.1 /100 | #214 | Tragic 3.2% |
Bangladeshis | 8.1 /100 | #215 | Tragic 3.2% |
Immigrants | Norway | 7.3 /100 | #216 | Tragic 3.2% |
Russians | 7.1 /100 | #217 | Tragic 3.2% |
Immigrants | Northern Europe | 7.0 /100 | #218 | Tragic 3.2% |
New Zealanders | 6.8 /100 | #219 | Tragic 3.2% |
Malaysians | 6.6 /100 | #220 | Tragic 3.2% |
Immigrants | Laos | 6.6 /100 | #221 | Tragic 3.2% |
Immigrants | Oceania | 6.5 /100 | #222 | Tragic 3.2% |