Lithuanian vs Immigrants from Switzerland Self-Care Disability
COMPARE
Lithuanian
Immigrants from Switzerland
Self-Care Disability
Self-Care Disability Comparison
Lithuanians
Immigrants from Switzerland
2.4%
SELF-CARE DISABILITY
98.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
88th/ 347
METRIC RANK
2.3%
SELF-CARE DISABILITY
99.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
74th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Lithuanian vs Immigrants from Switzerland Self-Care Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 421,348,071 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Lithuanians and percentage of population with self-care disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.518 and weighted average of 2.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 148,009,249 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Switzerland and percentage of population with self-care disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.342 and weighted average of 2.3%, a difference of 1.0%.
Self-Care Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Lithuanian | Immigrants from Switzerland |
Minimum | 0.63% | 0.48% |
Maximum | 13.3% | 6.6% |
Range | 12.7% | 6.1% |
Mean | 3.3% | 2.7% |
Median | 2.6% | 2.2% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.2% | 1.9% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 3.4% | 2.7% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.2% | 0.81% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.2% | 1.6% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.1% | 1.5% |
Demographics Similar to Lithuanians and Immigrants from Switzerland by Self-Care Disability
In terms of self-care disability, the demographic groups most similar to Lithuanians are Sierra Leonean (2.4%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Congo (2.4%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Northern Africa (2.3%, a difference of 0.14%), Estonian (2.3%, a difference of 0.16%), and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia (2.4%, a difference of 0.19%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Switzerland are Immigrants from Netherlands (2.3%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from China (2.3%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Egypt (2.3%, a difference of 0.060%), Eastern European (2.3%, a difference of 0.090%), and Asian (2.3%, a difference of 0.12%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Self-Care Disability |
Asians | 99.2 /100 | #71 | Exceptional 2.3% |
Eastern Europeans | 99.2 /100 | #72 | Exceptional 2.3% |
Immigrants | Egypt | 99.1 /100 | #73 | Exceptional 2.3% |
Immigrants | Switzerland | 99.1 /100 | #74 | Exceptional 2.3% |
Immigrants | Netherlands | 99.1 /100 | #75 | Exceptional 2.3% |
Immigrants | China | 99.1 /100 | #76 | Exceptional 2.3% |
Immigrants | Middle Africa | 99.0 /100 | #77 | Exceptional 2.3% |
Immigrants | Ireland | 99.0 /100 | #78 | Exceptional 2.3% |
Immigrants | Kenya | 99.0 /100 | #79 | Exceptional 2.3% |
Chileans | 98.8 /100 | #80 | Exceptional 2.3% |
Ugandans | 98.8 /100 | #81 | Exceptional 2.3% |
Immigrants | Denmark | 98.8 /100 | #82 | Exceptional 2.3% |
Indians (Asian) | 98.7 /100 | #83 | Exceptional 2.3% |
Immigrants | Spain | 98.7 /100 | #84 | Exceptional 2.3% |
Estonians | 98.3 /100 | #85 | Exceptional 2.3% |
Immigrants | Northern Africa | 98.2 /100 | #86 | Exceptional 2.3% |
Sierra Leoneans | 98.0 /100 | #87 | Exceptional 2.4% |
Lithuanians | 98.0 /100 | #88 | Exceptional 2.4% |
Immigrants | Congo | 98.0 /100 | #89 | Exceptional 2.4% |
Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 97.7 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 2.4% |
Immigrants | Jordan | 97.7 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 2.4% |