Lithuanian vs Immigrants from Asia Self-Care Disability
COMPARE
Lithuanian
Immigrants from Asia
Self-Care Disability
Self-Care Disability Comparison
Lithuanians
Immigrants from Asia
2.4%
SELF-CARE DISABILITY
98.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
88th/ 347
METRIC RANK
2.4%
SELF-CARE DISABILITY
96.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
95th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Lithuanian vs Immigrants from Asia Self-Care Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 421,348,071 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Lithuanians and percentage of population with self-care disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.518 and weighted average of 2.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 547,490,821 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Asia and percentage of population with self-care disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.312 and weighted average of 2.4%, a difference of 0.59%.
Self-Care Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Lithuanian | Immigrants from Asia |
| Minimum | 0.63% | 0.037% |
| Maximum | 13.3% | 25.8% |
| Range | 12.7% | 25.8% |
| Mean | 3.3% | 2.6% |
| Median | 2.6% | 2.3% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.2% | 2.1% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 3.4% | 2.5% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.2% | 0.44% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.2% | 2.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.1% | 2.4% |
Demographics Similar to Lithuanians and Immigrants from Asia by Self-Care Disability
In terms of self-care disability, the demographic groups most similar to Lithuanians are Sierra Leonean (2.4%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Congo (2.4%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Northern Africa (2.3%, a difference of 0.14%), Estonian (2.3%, a difference of 0.16%), and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia (2.4%, a difference of 0.19%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Asia are Macedonian (2.4%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Latvia (2.4%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Chile (2.4%, a difference of 0.060%), Swiss (2.4%, a difference of 0.10%), and Immigrants from Poland (2.4%, a difference of 0.19%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Self-Care Disability |
| Ugandans | 98.8 /100 | #81 | Exceptional 2.3% |
| Immigrants | Denmark | 98.8 /100 | #82 | Exceptional 2.3% |
| Indians (Asian) | 98.7 /100 | #83 | Exceptional 2.3% |
| Immigrants | Spain | 98.7 /100 | #84 | Exceptional 2.3% |
| Estonians | 98.3 /100 | #85 | Exceptional 2.3% |
| Immigrants | Northern Africa | 98.2 /100 | #86 | Exceptional 2.3% |
| Sierra Leoneans | 98.0 /100 | #87 | Exceptional 2.4% |
| Lithuanians | 98.0 /100 | #88 | Exceptional 2.4% |
| Immigrants | Congo | 98.0 /100 | #89 | Exceptional 2.4% |
| Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 97.7 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 2.4% |
| Immigrants | Jordan | 97.7 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 2.4% |
| Icelanders | 97.4 /100 | #92 | Exceptional 2.4% |
| Immigrants | Latvia | 97.0 /100 | #93 | Exceptional 2.4% |
| Macedonians | 96.9 /100 | #94 | Exceptional 2.4% |
| Immigrants | Asia | 96.9 /100 | #95 | Exceptional 2.4% |
| Immigrants | Chile | 96.7 /100 | #96 | Exceptional 2.4% |
| Swiss | 96.6 /100 | #97 | Exceptional 2.4% |
| Immigrants | Poland | 96.4 /100 | #98 | Exceptional 2.4% |
| Immigrants | Israel | 96.1 /100 | #99 | Exceptional 2.4% |
| Europeans | 95.8 /100 | #100 | Exceptional 2.4% |
| Immigrants | Scotland | 95.7 /100 | #101 | Exceptional 2.4% |