Laotian vs Sri Lankan Disability Age 35 to 64
COMPARE
Laotian
Sri Lankan
Disability Age 35 to 64
Disability Age 35 to 64 Comparison
Laotians
Sri Lankans
10.1%
DISABILITY AGE 35 TO 64
99.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
74th/ 347
METRIC RANK
10.2%
DISABILITY AGE 35 TO 64
99.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
84th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Laotian vs Sri Lankan Disability Age 35 to 64 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 224,740,086 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Laotians and percentage of population with a disability between the ages 34 and 64 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.039 and weighted average of 10.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 440,040,634 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Sri Lankans and percentage of population with a disability between the ages 34 and 64 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.282 and weighted average of 10.2%, a difference of 0.71%.
Disability Age 35 to 64 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Laotian | Sri Lankan |
Minimum | 1.9% | 1.2% |
Maximum | 30.5% | 50.9% |
Range | 28.6% | 49.7% |
Mean | 12.4% | 11.8% |
Median | 10.2% | 9.3% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 7.3% | 8.0% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 16.5% | 10.8% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 9.1% | 2.7% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 7.2% | 8.7% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 7.1% | 8.7% |
Demographics Similar to Laotians and Sri Lankans by Disability Age 35 to 64
In terms of disability age 35 to 64, the demographic groups most similar to Laotians are Immigrants from Latvia (10.1%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Chile (10.1%, a difference of 0.10%), Mongolian (10.1%, a difference of 0.14%), Immigrants from France (10.1%, a difference of 0.18%), and Immigrants from Northern Europe (10.1%, a difference of 0.19%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Sri Lankans are Immigrants from Brazil (10.2%, a difference of 0.060%), Russian (10.2%, a difference of 0.080%), Latvian (10.2%, a difference of 0.13%), Immigrants from Kuwait (10.2%, a difference of 0.21%), and Immigrants from Croatia (10.2%, a difference of 0.23%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Disability Age 35 to 64 |
Immigrants | Eastern Europe | 99.5 /100 | #69 | Exceptional 10.1% |
Immigrants | Nicaragua | 99.5 /100 | #70 | Exceptional 10.1% |
Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 99.5 /100 | #71 | Exceptional 10.1% |
Immigrants | Northern Europe | 99.5 /100 | #72 | Exceptional 10.1% |
Immigrants | France | 99.5 /100 | #73 | Exceptional 10.1% |
Laotians | 99.4 /100 | #74 | Exceptional 10.1% |
Immigrants | Latvia | 99.4 /100 | #75 | Exceptional 10.1% |
Immigrants | Chile | 99.4 /100 | #76 | Exceptional 10.1% |
Mongolians | 99.4 /100 | #77 | Exceptional 10.1% |
Jordanians | 99.3 /100 | #78 | Exceptional 10.1% |
Immigrants | Vietnam | 99.3 /100 | #79 | Exceptional 10.1% |
Immigrants | Croatia | 99.3 /100 | #80 | Exceptional 10.2% |
Latvians | 99.2 /100 | #81 | Exceptional 10.2% |
Russians | 99.2 /100 | #82 | Exceptional 10.2% |
Immigrants | Brazil | 99.2 /100 | #83 | Exceptional 10.2% |
Sri Lankans | 99.2 /100 | #84 | Exceptional 10.2% |
Immigrants | Kuwait | 99.1 /100 | #85 | Exceptional 10.2% |
Immigrants | Europe | 99.1 /100 | #86 | Exceptional 10.2% |
Nicaraguans | 99.1 /100 | #87 | Exceptional 10.2% |
Chileans | 99.0 /100 | #88 | Exceptional 10.2% |
Uruguayans | 99.0 /100 | #89 | Exceptional 10.2% |