Choctaw vs Sri Lankan Disability Age 35 to 64
COMPARE
Choctaw
Sri Lankan
Disability Age 35 to 64
Disability Age 35 to 64 Comparison
Choctaw
Sri Lankans
16.4%
DISABILITY AGE 35 TO 64
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
340th/ 347
METRIC RANK
10.2%
DISABILITY AGE 35 TO 64
99.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
84th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Choctaw vs Sri Lankan Disability Age 35 to 64 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 269,605,356 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Choctaw and percentage of population with a disability between the ages 34 and 64 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.246 and weighted average of 16.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 440,040,634 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Sri Lankans and percentage of population with a disability between the ages 34 and 64 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.282 and weighted average of 10.2%, a difference of 61.1%.
Disability Age 35 to 64 Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Choctaw | Sri Lankan |
| Minimum | 2.2% | 1.2% |
| Maximum | 50.0% | 50.9% |
| Range | 47.8% | 49.7% |
| Mean | 26.3% | 11.8% |
| Median | 25.6% | 9.3% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 21.5% | 8.0% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 30.9% | 10.8% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 9.4% | 2.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 7.4% | 8.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 7.4% | 8.7% |
Similar Demographics by Disability Age 35 to 64
Demographics Similar to Choctaw by Disability Age 35 to 64
In terms of disability age 35 to 64, the demographic groups most similar to Choctaw are Pima (16.1%, a difference of 1.7%), Chickasaw (16.1%, a difference of 1.9%), Tsimshian (16.7%, a difference of 1.9%), Tohono O'odham (16.7%, a difference of 2.0%), and Creek (16.9%, a difference of 2.9%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Disability Age 35 to 64 |
| Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 15.8% |
| Colville | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 15.8% |
| Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 15.9% |
| Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 15.9% |
| Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 15.9% |
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 16.1% |
| Pima | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 16.1% |
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 16.4% |
| Tsimshian | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 16.7% |
| Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 16.7% |
| Creek | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 16.9% |
| Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 16.9% |
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 17.4% |
| Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #346 | Tragic 17.6% |
| Houma | 0.0 /100 | #347 | Tragic 18.7% |
Demographics Similar to Sri Lankans by Disability Age 35 to 64
In terms of disability age 35 to 64, the demographic groups most similar to Sri Lankans are Immigrants from Brazil (10.2%, a difference of 0.060%), Russian (10.2%, a difference of 0.080%), Latvian (10.2%, a difference of 0.13%), Immigrants from Kuwait (10.2%, a difference of 0.21%), and Immigrants from Croatia (10.2%, a difference of 0.23%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Disability Age 35 to 64 |
| Mongolians | 99.4 /100 | #77 | Exceptional 10.1% |
| Jordanians | 99.3 /100 | #78 | Exceptional 10.1% |
| Immigrants | Vietnam | 99.3 /100 | #79 | Exceptional 10.1% |
| Immigrants | Croatia | 99.3 /100 | #80 | Exceptional 10.2% |
| Latvians | 99.2 /100 | #81 | Exceptional 10.2% |
| Russians | 99.2 /100 | #82 | Exceptional 10.2% |
| Immigrants | Brazil | 99.2 /100 | #83 | Exceptional 10.2% |
| Sri Lankans | 99.2 /100 | #84 | Exceptional 10.2% |
| Immigrants | Kuwait | 99.1 /100 | #85 | Exceptional 10.2% |
| Immigrants | Europe | 99.1 /100 | #86 | Exceptional 10.2% |
| Nicaraguans | 99.1 /100 | #87 | Exceptional 10.2% |
| Chileans | 99.0 /100 | #88 | Exceptional 10.2% |
| Uruguayans | 99.0 /100 | #89 | Exceptional 10.2% |
| Afghans | 98.9 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 10.3% |
| Immigrants | Lebanon | 98.9 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 10.3% |