Jordanian vs Turkish Female Disability
COMPARE
Jordanian
Turkish
Female Disability
Female Disability Comparison
Jordanians
Turks
11.3%
FEMALE DISABILITY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
47th/ 347
METRIC RANK
11.1%
FEMALE DISABILITY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
30th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Jordanian vs Turkish Female Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 166,415,888 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Jordanians and percentage of females with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.201 and weighted average of 11.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 271,848,470 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Turks and percentage of females with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.338 and weighted average of 11.1%, a difference of 1.5%.
Female Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Jordanian | Turkish |
Minimum | 6.5% | 3.8% |
Maximum | 20.5% | 25.3% |
Range | 14.0% | 21.5% |
Mean | 10.6% | 12.0% |
Median | 10.9% | 10.7% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 8.6% | 9.4% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 11.6% | 12.8% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.0% | 3.5% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.5% | 4.5% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.5% | 4.5% |
Demographics Similar to Jordanians and Turks by Female Disability
In terms of female disability, the demographic groups most similar to Jordanians are Zimbabwean (11.3%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Nepal (11.3%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Sweden (11.3%, a difference of 0.060%), Cambodian (11.3%, a difference of 0.10%), and Afghan (11.2%, a difference of 0.30%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Turks are Immigrants from Malaysia (11.1%, a difference of 0.0%), Egyptian (11.1%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Kuwait (11.1%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Australia (11.1%, a difference of 0.27%), and Immigrants from Egypt (11.1%, a difference of 0.35%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Disability |
Egyptians | 100.0 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 11.1% |
Immigrants | Malaysia | 100.0 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 11.1% |
Turks | 100.0 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 11.1% |
Immigrants | Kuwait | 100.0 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 11.1% |
Immigrants | Australia | 100.0 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 11.1% |
Immigrants | Egypt | 100.0 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 11.1% |
Immigrants | Indonesia | 100.0 /100 | #34 | Exceptional 11.2% |
Immigrants | Japan | 100.0 /100 | #35 | Exceptional 11.2% |
Cypriots | 100.0 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 11.2% |
Ethiopians | 100.0 /100 | #37 | Exceptional 11.2% |
Immigrants | Ethiopia | 100.0 /100 | #38 | Exceptional 11.2% |
Immigrants | Lithuania | 100.0 /100 | #39 | Exceptional 11.2% |
Mongolians | 100.0 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 11.2% |
Paraguayans | 100.0 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 11.2% |
Israelis | 100.0 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 11.2% |
Afghans | 100.0 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 11.2% |
Cambodians | 100.0 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 11.3% |
Immigrants | Sweden | 100.0 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 11.3% |
Immigrants | Nepal | 100.0 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 11.3% |
Jordanians | 100.0 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 11.3% |
Zimbabweans | 100.0 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 11.3% |