Jordanian vs Tongan Female Disability
COMPARE
Jordanian
Tongan
Female Disability
Female Disability Comparison
Jordanians
Tongans
11.3%
FEMALE DISABILITY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
47th/ 347
METRIC RANK
11.3%
FEMALE DISABILITY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
49th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Jordanian vs Tongan Female Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 166,415,888 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Jordanians and percentage of females with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.201 and weighted average of 11.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 102,892,967 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Tongans and percentage of females with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.229 and weighted average of 11.3%, a difference of 0.010%.
Female Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Jordanian | Tongan |
Minimum | 6.5% | 1.6% |
Maximum | 20.5% | 23.4% |
Range | 14.0% | 21.8% |
Mean | 10.6% | 11.5% |
Median | 10.9% | 11.3% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 8.6% | 10.3% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 11.6% | 12.3% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.0% | 1.9% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.5% | 3.6% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.5% | 3.6% |
Demographics Similar to Jordanians and Tongans by Female Disability
In terms of female disability, the demographic groups most similar to Jordanians are Zimbabwean (11.3%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Nepal (11.3%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Sweden (11.3%, a difference of 0.060%), Cambodian (11.3%, a difference of 0.10%), and Inupiat (11.3%, a difference of 0.24%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Tongans are Zimbabwean (11.3%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Nepal (11.3%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Sweden (11.3%, a difference of 0.080%), Cambodian (11.3%, a difference of 0.12%), and Inupiat (11.3%, a difference of 0.23%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Disability |
Immigrants | Ethiopia | 100.0 /100 | #38 | Exceptional 11.2% |
Immigrants | Lithuania | 100.0 /100 | #39 | Exceptional 11.2% |
Mongolians | 100.0 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 11.2% |
Paraguayans | 100.0 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 11.2% |
Israelis | 100.0 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 11.2% |
Afghans | 100.0 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 11.2% |
Cambodians | 100.0 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 11.3% |
Immigrants | Sweden | 100.0 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 11.3% |
Immigrants | Nepal | 100.0 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 11.3% |
Jordanians | 100.0 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 11.3% |
Zimbabweans | 100.0 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 11.3% |
Tongans | 100.0 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 11.3% |
Inupiat | 100.0 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 11.3% |
Immigrants | Belgium | 100.0 /100 | #51 | Exceptional 11.3% |
Immigrants | Peru | 99.9 /100 | #52 | Exceptional 11.3% |
Immigrants | Saudi Arabia | 99.9 /100 | #53 | Exceptional 11.3% |
Peruvians | 99.9 /100 | #54 | Exceptional 11.3% |
Bulgarians | 99.9 /100 | #55 | Exceptional 11.3% |
Taiwanese | 99.9 /100 | #56 | Exceptional 11.4% |
South Americans | 99.9 /100 | #57 | Exceptional 11.4% |
Laotians | 99.9 /100 | #58 | Exceptional 11.4% |