Immigrants from Zimbabwe vs Immigrants from Latvia Male Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Zimbabwe
Immigrants from Latvia
Male Disability
Male Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Zimbabwe
Immigrants from Latvia
10.8%
MALE DISABILITY
93.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
113th/ 347
METRIC RANK
10.9%
MALE DISABILITY
85.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
128th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Zimbabwe vs Immigrants from Latvia Male Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 117,811,453 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Zimbabwe and percentage of males with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.645 and weighted average of 10.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 113,739,259 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Latvia and percentage of males with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.514 and weighted average of 10.9%, a difference of 1.2%.
Male Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Zimbabwe | Immigrants from Latvia |
Minimum | 1.5% | 2.7% |
Maximum | 41.0% | 37.7% |
Range | 39.5% | 35.1% |
Mean | 14.2% | 12.6% |
Median | 11.0% | 10.8% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 9.4% | 8.9% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 15.9% | 16.1% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.5% | 7.2% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 8.2% | 7.5% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 8.1% | 7.4% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Immigrants from Latvia by Male Disability
In terms of male disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Zimbabwe are Central American (10.8%, a difference of 0.070%), Ghanaian (10.8%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Barbados (10.8%, a difference of 0.16%), Immigrants from Uruguay (10.8%, a difference of 0.18%), and Immigrants (10.8%, a difference of 0.22%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Latvia are Immigrants from Philippines (10.9%, a difference of 0.0%), Brazilian (10.9%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Ukraine (10.9%, a difference of 0.16%), Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago (10.9%, a difference of 0.17%), and South American Indian (10.9%, a difference of 0.33%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Disability |
Immigrants | Immigrants | 93.9 /100 | #110 | Exceptional 10.8% |
Immigrants | Uruguay | 93.8 /100 | #111 | Exceptional 10.8% |
Ghanaians | 93.4 /100 | #112 | Exceptional 10.8% |
Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 93.0 /100 | #113 | Exceptional 10.8% |
Central Americans | 92.7 /100 | #114 | Exceptional 10.8% |
Immigrants | Barbados | 92.2 /100 | #115 | Exceptional 10.8% |
Immigrants | South Africa | 91.8 /100 | #116 | Exceptional 10.8% |
Eastern Europeans | 90.6 /100 | #117 | Exceptional 10.9% |
Immigrants | Cuba | 90.2 /100 | #118 | Exceptional 10.9% |
Armenians | 90.1 /100 | #119 | Exceptional 10.9% |
Immigrants | Africa | 89.4 /100 | #120 | Excellent 10.9% |
Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 89.2 /100 | #121 | Excellent 10.9% |
Immigrants | Ghana | 89.0 /100 | #122 | Excellent 10.9% |
Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 88.4 /100 | #123 | Excellent 10.9% |
South American Indians | 88.1 /100 | #124 | Excellent 10.9% |
Immigrants | North Macedonia | 88.1 /100 | #125 | Excellent 10.9% |
Immigrants | Trinidad and Tobago | 86.9 /100 | #126 | Excellent 10.9% |
Immigrants | Ukraine | 86.8 /100 | #127 | Excellent 10.9% |
Immigrants | Latvia | 85.5 /100 | #128 | Excellent 10.9% |
Immigrants | Philippines | 85.4 /100 | #129 | Excellent 10.9% |
Brazilians | 85.4 /100 | #130 | Excellent 10.9% |