Immigrants from Zimbabwe vs Ghanaian Male Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Zimbabwe
Ghanaian
Male Disability
Male Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Zimbabwe
Ghanaians
10.8%
MALE DISABILITY
93.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
113th/ 347
METRIC RANK
10.8%
MALE DISABILITY
93.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
112th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Zimbabwe vs Ghanaian Male Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 117,811,453 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Zimbabwe and percentage of males with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.645 and weighted average of 10.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 190,687,278 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Ghanaians and percentage of males with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.139 and weighted average of 10.8%, a difference of 0.090%.
Male Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Zimbabwe | Ghanaian |
Minimum | 1.5% | 1.4% |
Maximum | 41.0% | 25.9% |
Range | 39.5% | 24.5% |
Mean | 14.2% | 11.0% |
Median | 11.0% | 11.0% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 9.4% | 8.7% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 15.9% | 11.7% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.5% | 3.0% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 8.2% | 4.2% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 8.1% | 4.1% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Ghanaians by Male Disability
In terms of male disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Zimbabwe are Central American (10.8%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Barbados (10.8%, a difference of 0.16%), Immigrants from Uruguay (10.8%, a difference of 0.18%), Immigrants (10.8%, a difference of 0.22%), and Immigrants from South Africa (10.8%, a difference of 0.24%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Ghanaians are Immigrants from Uruguay (10.8%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants (10.8%, a difference of 0.14%), Central American (10.8%, a difference of 0.15%), Immigrants from Uganda (10.8%, a difference of 0.16%), and Immigrants from Belgium (10.8%, a difference of 0.21%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Disability |
Immigrants | Eastern Europe | 95.3 /100 | #102 | Exceptional 10.7% |
Uruguayans | 95.3 /100 | #103 | Exceptional 10.7% |
Immigrants | Nigeria | 95.1 /100 | #104 | Exceptional 10.8% |
Immigrants | Brazil | 95.0 /100 | #105 | Exceptional 10.8% |
Immigrants | Syria | 94.9 /100 | #106 | Exceptional 10.8% |
Immigrants | Eastern Africa | 94.3 /100 | #107 | Exceptional 10.8% |
Immigrants | Belgium | 94.2 /100 | #108 | Exceptional 10.8% |
Immigrants | Uganda | 94.0 /100 | #109 | Exceptional 10.8% |
Immigrants | Immigrants | 93.9 /100 | #110 | Exceptional 10.8% |
Immigrants | Uruguay | 93.8 /100 | #111 | Exceptional 10.8% |
Ghanaians | 93.4 /100 | #112 | Exceptional 10.8% |
Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 93.0 /100 | #113 | Exceptional 10.8% |
Central Americans | 92.7 /100 | #114 | Exceptional 10.8% |
Immigrants | Barbados | 92.2 /100 | #115 | Exceptional 10.8% |
Immigrants | South Africa | 91.8 /100 | #116 | Exceptional 10.8% |
Eastern Europeans | 90.6 /100 | #117 | Exceptional 10.9% |
Immigrants | Cuba | 90.2 /100 | #118 | Exceptional 10.9% |
Armenians | 90.1 /100 | #119 | Exceptional 10.9% |
Immigrants | Africa | 89.4 /100 | #120 | Excellent 10.9% |
Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 89.2 /100 | #121 | Excellent 10.9% |
Immigrants | Ghana | 89.0 /100 | #122 | Excellent 10.9% |