Immigrants from Uganda vs Immigrants from Chile Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Uganda
Immigrants from Chile
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Uganda
Immigrants from Chile
5.7%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
99.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
67th/ 347
METRIC RANK
5.8%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
98.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
87th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Uganda vs Immigrants from Chile Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 125,972,414 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Uganda and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.004 and weighted average of 5.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 218,629,833 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Chile and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.824 and weighted average of 5.8%, a difference of 1.6%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Uganda | Immigrants from Chile |
Minimum | 0.18% | 2.4% |
Maximum | 15.5% | 23.8% |
Range | 15.3% | 21.4% |
Mean | 5.8% | 6.8% |
Median | 5.6% | 5.5% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.1% | 4.9% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 7.0% | 7.2% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.9% | 2.3% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.8% | 4.3% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.8% | 4.2% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Uganda and Immigrants from Chile by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Uganda are Sri Lankan (5.7%, a difference of 0.030%), Peruvian (5.7%, a difference of 0.46%), Sierra Leonean (5.7%, a difference of 0.69%), Immigrants from Peru (5.7%, a difference of 0.78%), and Brazilian (5.7%, a difference of 0.80%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Chile are Latvian (5.7%, a difference of 0.060%), South American (5.7%, a difference of 0.090%), Ugandan (5.7%, a difference of 0.33%), Eastern European (5.7%, a difference of 0.34%), and Immigrants from Jordan (5.7%, a difference of 0.36%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
Immigrants | Uganda | 99.6 /100 | #67 | Exceptional 5.7% |
Sri Lankans | 99.6 /100 | #68 | Exceptional 5.7% |
Peruvians | 99.5 /100 | #69 | Exceptional 5.7% |
Sierra Leoneans | 99.4 /100 | #70 | Exceptional 5.7% |
Immigrants | Peru | 99.4 /100 | #71 | Exceptional 5.7% |
Brazilians | 99.4 /100 | #72 | Exceptional 5.7% |
Immigrants | Northern Africa | 99.4 /100 | #73 | Exceptional 5.7% |
Immigrants | Cameroon | 99.4 /100 | #74 | Exceptional 5.7% |
Immigrants | South Africa | 99.3 /100 | #75 | Exceptional 5.7% |
Sudanese | 99.3 /100 | #76 | Exceptional 5.7% |
Immigrants | Vietnam | 99.3 /100 | #77 | Exceptional 5.7% |
Somalis | 99.2 /100 | #78 | Exceptional 5.7% |
Chileans | 99.2 /100 | #79 | Exceptional 5.7% |
Immigrants | Ireland | 99.2 /100 | #80 | Exceptional 5.7% |
Immigrants | Jordan | 99.2 /100 | #81 | Exceptional 5.7% |
Palestinians | 99.2 /100 | #82 | Exceptional 5.7% |
Eastern Europeans | 99.2 /100 | #83 | Exceptional 5.7% |
Ugandans | 99.2 /100 | #84 | Exceptional 5.7% |
South Americans | 99.0 /100 | #85 | Exceptional 5.7% |
Latvians | 99.0 /100 | #86 | Exceptional 5.7% |
Immigrants | Chile | 98.9 /100 | #87 | Exceptional 5.8% |