Brazilian vs Immigrants from Chile Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Brazilian
Immigrants from Chile
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Brazilians
Immigrants from Chile
5.7%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
99.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
72nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
5.8%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
98.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
87th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Brazilian vs Immigrants from Chile Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 323,890,507 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Brazilians and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.427 and weighted average of 5.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 218,629,833 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Chile and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.824 and weighted average of 5.8%, a difference of 0.79%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Brazilian | Immigrants from Chile |
Minimum | 2.3% | 2.4% |
Maximum | 13.4% | 23.8% |
Range | 11.1% | 21.4% |
Mean | 6.1% | 6.8% |
Median | 5.7% | 5.5% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.2% | 4.9% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 6.7% | 7.2% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.5% | 2.3% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.0% | 4.3% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.0% | 4.2% |
Demographics Similar to Brazilians and Immigrants from Chile by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Brazilians are Immigrants from Peru (5.7%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Northern Africa (5.7%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Cameroon (5.7%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from South Africa (5.7%, a difference of 0.070%), and Sudanese (5.7%, a difference of 0.090%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Chile are Soviet Union (5.8%, a difference of 0.040%), Latvian (5.7%, a difference of 0.060%), South American (5.7%, a difference of 0.090%), Bhutanese (5.8%, a difference of 0.16%), and Ugandan (5.7%, a difference of 0.33%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
Peruvians | 99.5 /100 | #69 | Exceptional 5.7% |
Sierra Leoneans | 99.4 /100 | #70 | Exceptional 5.7% |
Immigrants | Peru | 99.4 /100 | #71 | Exceptional 5.7% |
Brazilians | 99.4 /100 | #72 | Exceptional 5.7% |
Immigrants | Northern Africa | 99.4 /100 | #73 | Exceptional 5.7% |
Immigrants | Cameroon | 99.4 /100 | #74 | Exceptional 5.7% |
Immigrants | South Africa | 99.3 /100 | #75 | Exceptional 5.7% |
Sudanese | 99.3 /100 | #76 | Exceptional 5.7% |
Immigrants | Vietnam | 99.3 /100 | #77 | Exceptional 5.7% |
Somalis | 99.2 /100 | #78 | Exceptional 5.7% |
Chileans | 99.2 /100 | #79 | Exceptional 5.7% |
Immigrants | Ireland | 99.2 /100 | #80 | Exceptional 5.7% |
Immigrants | Jordan | 99.2 /100 | #81 | Exceptional 5.7% |
Palestinians | 99.2 /100 | #82 | Exceptional 5.7% |
Eastern Europeans | 99.2 /100 | #83 | Exceptional 5.7% |
Ugandans | 99.2 /100 | #84 | Exceptional 5.7% |
South Americans | 99.0 /100 | #85 | Exceptional 5.7% |
Latvians | 99.0 /100 | #86 | Exceptional 5.7% |
Immigrants | Chile | 98.9 /100 | #87 | Exceptional 5.8% |
Soviet Union | 98.9 /100 | #88 | Exceptional 5.8% |
Bhutanese | 98.8 /100 | #89 | Exceptional 5.8% |