Immigrants from Oceania vs Subsaharan African Female Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Oceania
Subsaharan African
Female Disability
Female Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Oceania
Sub-Saharan Africans
12.1%
FEMALE DISABILITY
61.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
165th/ 347
METRIC RANK
12.7%
FEMALE DISABILITY
1.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
260th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Oceania vs Subsaharan African Female Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 305,480,731 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Oceania and percentage of females with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.114 and weighted average of 12.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 508,044,435 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Sub-Saharan Africans and percentage of females with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.375 and weighted average of 12.7%, a difference of 4.8%.
Female Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Oceania | Subsaharan African |
Minimum | 2.2% | 4.5% |
Maximum | 48.6% | 53.3% |
Range | 46.4% | 48.8% |
Mean | 15.8% | 15.1% |
Median | 13.2% | 12.9% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 11.9% | 12.1% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 16.4% | 16.1% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.5% | 4.0% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 9.0% | 7.0% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 8.8% | 7.0% |
Similar Demographics by Female Disability
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Oceania by Female Disability
In terms of female disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Oceania are Czech (12.1%, a difference of 0.070%), Guatemalan (12.1%, a difference of 0.080%), Lithuanian (12.2%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Ukraine (12.1%, a difference of 0.10%), and Guyanese (12.1%, a difference of 0.11%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Disability |
Immigrants | Middle Africa | 72.4 /100 | #158 | Good 12.1% |
Immigrants | Central America | 67.7 /100 | #159 | Good 12.1% |
Immigrants | Guatemala | 66.0 /100 | #160 | Good 12.1% |
Guyanese | 64.7 /100 | #161 | Good 12.1% |
Immigrants | Ukraine | 64.3 /100 | #162 | Good 12.1% |
Guatemalans | 63.8 /100 | #163 | Good 12.1% |
Czechs | 63.6 /100 | #164 | Good 12.1% |
Immigrants | Oceania | 61.8 /100 | #165 | Good 12.1% |
Lithuanians | 59.5 /100 | #166 | Average 12.2% |
Immigrants | Latin America | 59.0 /100 | #167 | Average 12.2% |
Immigrants | Haiti | 58.8 /100 | #168 | Average 12.2% |
Lebanese | 58.1 /100 | #169 | Average 12.2% |
Maltese | 57.0 /100 | #170 | Average 12.2% |
Immigrants | Southern Europe | 56.3 /100 | #171 | Average 12.2% |
Haitians | 51.9 /100 | #172 | Average 12.2% |
Demographics Similar to Sub-Saharan Africans by Female Disability
In terms of female disability, the demographic groups most similar to Sub-Saharan Africans are Immigrants from Armenia (12.7%, a difference of 0.010%), Bermudan (12.7%, a difference of 0.040%), Aleut (12.7%, a difference of 0.090%), Liberian (12.7%, a difference of 0.10%), and Czechoslovakian (12.7%, a difference of 0.11%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Disability |
Jamaicans | 1.4 /100 | #253 | Tragic 12.7% |
Hawaiians | 1.4 /100 | #254 | Tragic 12.7% |
Immigrants | Germany | 1.3 /100 | #255 | Tragic 12.7% |
British West Indians | 1.2 /100 | #256 | Tragic 12.7% |
Liberians | 1.1 /100 | #257 | Tragic 12.7% |
Aleuts | 1.1 /100 | #258 | Tragic 12.7% |
Immigrants | Armenia | 1.0 /100 | #259 | Tragic 12.7% |
Sub-Saharan Africans | 1.0 /100 | #260 | Tragic 12.7% |
Bermudans | 1.0 /100 | #261 | Tragic 12.7% |
Czechoslovakians | 0.9 /100 | #262 | Tragic 12.7% |
Spaniards | 0.7 /100 | #263 | Tragic 12.8% |
Alaska Natives | 0.6 /100 | #264 | Tragic 12.8% |
West Indians | 0.5 /100 | #265 | Tragic 12.8% |
Finns | 0.4 /100 | #266 | Tragic 12.8% |
Senegalese | 0.4 /100 | #267 | Tragic 12.8% |