Aleut vs Subsaharan African Female Disability
COMPARE
Aleut
Subsaharan African
Female Disability
Female Disability Comparison
Aleuts
Sub-Saharan Africans
12.7%
FEMALE DISABILITY
1.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
258th/ 347
METRIC RANK
12.7%
FEMALE DISABILITY
1.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
260th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Aleut vs Subsaharan African Female Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 61,781,040 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Aleuts and percentage of females with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.050 and weighted average of 12.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 508,044,435 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Sub-Saharan Africans and percentage of females with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.375 and weighted average of 12.7%, a difference of 0.090%.
Female Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Aleut | Subsaharan African |
Minimum | 2.5% | 4.5% |
Maximum | 60.0% | 53.3% |
Range | 57.5% | 48.8% |
Mean | 14.9% | 15.1% |
Median | 12.5% | 12.9% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 9.2% | 12.1% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 16.2% | 16.1% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 7.0% | 4.0% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 10.5% | 7.0% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 10.4% | 7.0% |
Demographics Similar to Aleuts and Sub-Saharan Africans by Female Disability
In terms of female disability, the demographic groups most similar to Aleuts are Liberian (12.7%, a difference of 0.0%), British West Indian (12.7%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Armenia (12.7%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Germany (12.7%, a difference of 0.10%), and Bermudan (12.7%, a difference of 0.14%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Sub-Saharan Africans are Immigrants from Armenia (12.7%, a difference of 0.010%), Bermudan (12.7%, a difference of 0.040%), Liberian (12.7%, a difference of 0.10%), Czechoslovakian (12.7%, a difference of 0.11%), and British West Indian (12.7%, a difference of 0.13%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Disability |
Immigrants | Congo | 1.8 /100 | #249 | Tragic 12.7% |
Slovenes | 1.7 /100 | #250 | Tragic 12.7% |
Crow | 1.6 /100 | #251 | Tragic 12.7% |
Immigrants | Caribbean | 1.4 /100 | #252 | Tragic 12.7% |
Jamaicans | 1.4 /100 | #253 | Tragic 12.7% |
Hawaiians | 1.4 /100 | #254 | Tragic 12.7% |
Immigrants | Germany | 1.3 /100 | #255 | Tragic 12.7% |
British West Indians | 1.2 /100 | #256 | Tragic 12.7% |
Liberians | 1.1 /100 | #257 | Tragic 12.7% |
Aleuts | 1.1 /100 | #258 | Tragic 12.7% |
Immigrants | Armenia | 1.0 /100 | #259 | Tragic 12.7% |
Sub-Saharan Africans | 1.0 /100 | #260 | Tragic 12.7% |
Bermudans | 1.0 /100 | #261 | Tragic 12.7% |
Czechoslovakians | 0.9 /100 | #262 | Tragic 12.7% |
Spaniards | 0.7 /100 | #263 | Tragic 12.8% |
Alaska Natives | 0.6 /100 | #264 | Tragic 12.8% |
West Indians | 0.5 /100 | #265 | Tragic 12.8% |
Finns | 0.4 /100 | #266 | Tragic 12.8% |
Senegalese | 0.4 /100 | #267 | Tragic 12.8% |
Immigrants | Laos | 0.4 /100 | #268 | Tragic 12.8% |
Indonesians | 0.4 /100 | #269 | Tragic 12.8% |