Immigrants from Egypt vs Egyptian Disability Age 5 to 17

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 244,261,461 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Egypt and percentage of population with a disability between the ages 5 and 17 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.397 and weighted average of 5.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 275,465,028 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Egyptians and percentage of population with a disability between the ages 5 and 17 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.302 and weighted average of 5.0%, a difference of 0.66%.

Disability Age 5 to 17 Correlation Summary

Measurement	Immigrants from Egypt	Egyptian
Minimum	1.0%	0.99%
Maximum	11.5%	14.8%
Range	10.5%	13.8%
Mean	5.5%	5.2%
Median	4.9%	4.6%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	4.3%	3.8%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	6.5%	5.7%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	2.2%	1.9%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	2.4%	2.5%
Standard Deviation (Population)	2.3%	2.4%

Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Egypt and Egyptians by Disability Age 5 to 17

In terms of disability age 5 to 17, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Egypt are Immigrants from Belarus (5.0%, a difference of 0.030%), Bolivian (5.0%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Philippines (5.0%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Argentina (5.0%, a difference of 0.080%), and Okinawan (5.0%, a difference of 0.15%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Egyptians are Immigrants from Russia (5.0%, a difference of 0.040%), Tongan (5.0%, a difference of 0.070%), Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac (5.0%, a difference of 0.14%), Vietnamese (5.1%, a difference of 0.27%), and Immigrants from Sri Lanka (5.0%, a difference of 0.42%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Disability Age 5 to 17
Immigrants \| Malaysia	100.0 /100 \| #30	Exceptional 5.0%
Immigrants \| Pakistan	100.0 /100 \| #31	Exceptional 5.0%
Soviet Union	100.0 /100 \| #32	Exceptional 5.0%
Immigrants \| Indonesia	100.0 /100 \| #33	Exceptional 5.0%
Israelis	100.0 /100 \| #34	Exceptional 5.0%
Bolivians	100.0 /100 \| #35	Exceptional 5.0%
Immigrants \| Egypt	100.0 /100 \| #36	Exceptional 5.0%
Immigrants \| Belarus	100.0 /100 \| #37	Exceptional 5.0%
Immigrants \| Philippines	100.0 /100 \| #38	Exceptional 5.0%
Immigrants \| Argentina	100.0 /100 \| #39	Exceptional 5.0%
Okinawans	100.0 /100 \| #40	Exceptional 5.0%
Immigrants \| Australia	100.0 /100 \| #41	Exceptional 5.0%
Immigrants \| Sri Lanka	100.0 /100 \| #42	Exceptional 5.0%
Immigrants \| Russia	100.0 /100 \| #43	Exceptional 5.0%
Egyptians	100.0 /100 \| #44	Exceptional 5.0%
Tongans	100.0 /100 \| #45	Exceptional 5.0%
Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs	100.0 /100 \| #46	Exceptional 5.0%
Vietnamese	100.0 /100 \| #47	Exceptional 5.1%
Koreans	100.0 /100 \| #48	Exceptional 5.1%
Immigrants \| Western Asia	100.0 /100 \| #49	Exceptional 5.1%
Argentineans	99.9 /100 \| #50	Exceptional 5.1%