Immigrants from Chile vs Zimbabwean Male Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Chile
Zimbabwean
Male Disability
Male Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Chile
Zimbabweans
10.6%
MALE DISABILITY
98.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
81st/ 347
METRIC RANK
10.6%
MALE DISABILITY
98.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
79th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Chile vs Zimbabwean Male Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 218,637,346 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Chile and percentage of males with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.573 and weighted average of 10.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 69,206,379 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Zimbabweans and percentage of males with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.392 and weighted average of 10.6%, a difference of 0.080%.
Male Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Chile | Zimbabwean |
Minimum | 2.4% | 3.1% |
Maximum | 29.3% | 28.1% |
Range | 26.9% | 25.0% |
Mean | 12.2% | 11.3% |
Median | 10.3% | 10.2% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 9.2% | 9.2% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 13.6% | 12.1% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.4% | 2.9% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.8% | 4.8% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.7% | 4.8% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Chile and Zimbabweans by Male Disability
In terms of male disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Chile are Immigrants from Jordan (10.6%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Guyana (10.6%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Poland (10.6%, a difference of 0.13%), Bulgarian (10.6%, a difference of 0.14%), and Immigrants from Russia (10.6%, a difference of 0.30%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Zimbabweans are Immigrants from Jordan (10.6%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Guyana (10.6%, a difference of 0.15%), Immigrants from Poland (10.6%, a difference of 0.21%), Bulgarian (10.6%, a difference of 0.22%), and Immigrants from Russia (10.6%, a difference of 0.23%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Disability |
Immigrants | Bulgaria | 99.1 /100 | #70 | Exceptional 10.5% |
Immigrants | Cameroon | 99.0 /100 | #71 | Exceptional 10.5% |
Immigrants | Serbia | 99.0 /100 | #72 | Exceptional 10.5% |
Immigrants | Lithuania | 98.9 /100 | #73 | Exceptional 10.5% |
Immigrants | Lebanon | 98.8 /100 | #74 | Exceptional 10.5% |
Sierra Leoneans | 98.7 /100 | #75 | Exceptional 10.5% |
Immigrants | Sierra Leone | 98.7 /100 | #76 | Exceptional 10.5% |
Laotians | 98.6 /100 | #77 | Exceptional 10.6% |
Immigrants | Russia | 98.6 /100 | #78 | Exceptional 10.6% |
Zimbabweans | 98.4 /100 | #79 | Exceptional 10.6% |
Immigrants | Jordan | 98.4 /100 | #80 | Exceptional 10.6% |
Immigrants | Chile | 98.3 /100 | #81 | Exceptional 10.6% |
Immigrants | Guyana | 98.2 /100 | #82 | Exceptional 10.6% |
Immigrants | Poland | 98.1 /100 | #83 | Exceptional 10.6% |
Bulgarians | 98.1 /100 | #84 | Exceptional 10.6% |
Sri Lankans | 97.9 /100 | #85 | Exceptional 10.6% |
Immigrants | Ireland | 97.9 /100 | #86 | Exceptional 10.6% |
Immigrants | Vietnam | 97.9 /100 | #87 | Exceptional 10.6% |
Immigrants | Western Asia | 97.8 /100 | #88 | Exceptional 10.6% |
Immigrants | Nicaragua | 97.8 /100 | #89 | Exceptional 10.6% |
Immigrants | Morocco | 97.7 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 10.6% |