Immigrants from Belarus vs Zimbabwean Male Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Belarus
Zimbabwean
Male Disability
Male Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Belarus
Zimbabweans
10.4%
MALE DISABILITY
99.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
63rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
10.6%
MALE DISABILITY
98.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
79th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Belarus vs Zimbabwean Male Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 150,193,333 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Belarus and percentage of males with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.014 and weighted average of 10.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 69,206,379 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Zimbabweans and percentage of males with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.392 and weighted average of 10.6%, a difference of 1.3%.
Male Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Belarus | Zimbabwean |
Minimum | 2.0% | 3.1% |
Maximum | 29.5% | 28.1% |
Range | 27.4% | 25.0% |
Mean | 11.9% | 11.3% |
Median | 10.5% | 10.2% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 9.0% | 9.2% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 13.5% | 12.1% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.4% | 2.9% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.3% | 4.8% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.2% | 4.8% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Belarus and Zimbabweans by Male Disability
In terms of male disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Belarus are Immigrants from Ecuador (10.4%, a difference of 0.020%), Jordanian (10.5%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from Grenada (10.5%, a difference of 0.15%), Guyanese (10.5%, a difference of 0.15%), and Immigrants from Afghanistan (10.5%, a difference of 0.16%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Zimbabweans are Immigrants from Jordan (10.6%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Chile (10.6%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Russia (10.6%, a difference of 0.23%), Laotian (10.6%, a difference of 0.25%), and Immigrants from Sierra Leone (10.5%, a difference of 0.31%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Disability |
Immigrants | Northern Africa | 99.4 /100 | #61 | Exceptional 10.4% |
Immigrants | Ecuador | 99.3 /100 | #62 | Exceptional 10.4% |
Immigrants | Belarus | 99.3 /100 | #63 | Exceptional 10.4% |
Jordanians | 99.3 /100 | #64 | Exceptional 10.5% |
Immigrants | Grenada | 99.2 /100 | #65 | Exceptional 10.5% |
Guyanese | 99.2 /100 | #66 | Exceptional 10.5% |
Immigrants | Afghanistan | 99.2 /100 | #67 | Exceptional 10.5% |
Colombians | 99.2 /100 | #68 | Exceptional 10.5% |
Ecuadorians | 99.2 /100 | #69 | Exceptional 10.5% |
Immigrants | Bulgaria | 99.1 /100 | #70 | Exceptional 10.5% |
Immigrants | Cameroon | 99.0 /100 | #71 | Exceptional 10.5% |
Immigrants | Serbia | 99.0 /100 | #72 | Exceptional 10.5% |
Immigrants | Lithuania | 98.9 /100 | #73 | Exceptional 10.5% |
Immigrants | Lebanon | 98.8 /100 | #74 | Exceptional 10.5% |
Sierra Leoneans | 98.7 /100 | #75 | Exceptional 10.5% |
Immigrants | Sierra Leone | 98.7 /100 | #76 | Exceptional 10.5% |
Laotians | 98.6 /100 | #77 | Exceptional 10.6% |
Immigrants | Russia | 98.6 /100 | #78 | Exceptional 10.6% |
Zimbabweans | 98.4 /100 | #79 | Exceptional 10.6% |
Immigrants | Jordan | 98.4 /100 | #80 | Exceptional 10.6% |
Immigrants | Chile | 98.3 /100 | #81 | Exceptional 10.6% |