Finnish vs Ukrainian Vision Disability
COMPARE
Finnish
Ukrainian
Vision Disability
Vision Disability Comparison
Finns
Ukrainians
2.1%
VISION DISABILITY
78.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
148th/ 347
METRIC RANK
2.1%
VISION DISABILITY
81.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
144th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Finnish vs Ukrainian Vision Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 404,250,677 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Finns and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.007 and weighted average of 2.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 448,040,924 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Ukrainians and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.612 and weighted average of 2.1%, a difference of 0.37%.
Vision Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Finnish | Ukrainian |
Minimum | 0.59% | 0.95% |
Maximum | 4.6% | 11.5% |
Range | 4.0% | 10.5% |
Mean | 2.1% | 3.2% |
Median | 2.1% | 2.1% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 1.7% | 1.8% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 2.4% | 3.1% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 0.76% | 1.2% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 0.79% | 2.6% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 0.79% | 2.6% |
Demographics Similar to Finns and Ukrainians by Vision Disability
In terms of vision disability, the demographic groups most similar to Finns are Immigrants from Sudan (2.1%, a difference of 0.010%), Italian (2.1%, a difference of 0.14%), Colombian (2.1%, a difference of 0.19%), Belgian (2.1%, a difference of 0.22%), and Immigrants from Norway (2.1%, a difference of 0.25%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Ukrainians are Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina (2.1%, a difference of 0.040%), South American (2.1%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Sierra Leone (2.1%, a difference of 0.11%), Italian (2.1%, a difference of 0.23%), and Sierra Leonean (2.1%, a difference of 0.25%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Vision Disability |
Czechs | 86.3 /100 | #136 | Excellent 2.1% |
Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 86.3 /100 | #137 | Excellent 2.1% |
Arabs | 86.3 /100 | #138 | Excellent 2.1% |
Immigrants | Morocco | 85.2 /100 | #139 | Excellent 2.1% |
Immigrants | Netherlands | 84.2 /100 | #140 | Excellent 2.1% |
Sierra Leoneans | 84.1 /100 | #141 | Excellent 2.1% |
South Americans | 82.8 /100 | #142 | Excellent 2.1% |
Immigrants | Sierra Leone | 82.8 /100 | #143 | Excellent 2.1% |
Ukrainians | 81.9 /100 | #144 | Excellent 2.1% |
Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 81.5 /100 | #145 | Excellent 2.1% |
Italians | 79.7 /100 | #146 | Good 2.1% |
Immigrants | Sudan | 78.4 /100 | #147 | Good 2.1% |
Finns | 78.3 /100 | #148 | Good 2.1% |
Colombians | 76.2 /100 | #149 | Good 2.1% |
Belgians | 75.9 /100 | #150 | Good 2.1% |
Immigrants | Norway | 75.5 /100 | #151 | Good 2.1% |
Immigrants | Southern Europe | 74.6 /100 | #152 | Good 2.1% |
Immigrants | South America | 73.8 /100 | #153 | Good 2.1% |
Slovenes | 73.6 /100 | #154 | Good 2.1% |
Immigrants | Colombia | 72.1 /100 | #155 | Good 2.1% |
Pakistanis | 71.6 /100 | #156 | Good 2.1% |