Finnish vs Arab Vision Disability
COMPARE
Finnish
Arab
Vision Disability
Vision Disability Comparison
Finns
Arabs
2.1%
VISION DISABILITY
78.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
148th/ 347
METRIC RANK
2.1%
VISION DISABILITY
86.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
138th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Finnish vs Arab Vision Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 404,250,677 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Finns and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.007 and weighted average of 2.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 486,276,128 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Arabs and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.450 and weighted average of 2.1%, a difference of 0.90%.
Vision Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Finnish | Arab |
Minimum | 0.59% | 0.55% |
Maximum | 4.6% | 5.6% |
Range | 4.0% | 5.1% |
Mean | 2.1% | 2.4% |
Median | 2.1% | 2.1% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 1.7% | 1.8% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 2.4% | 2.8% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 0.76% | 1.0% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 0.79% | 1.1% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 0.79% | 1.1% |
Demographics Similar to Finns and Arabs by Vision Disability
In terms of vision disability, the demographic groups most similar to Finns are Immigrants from Sudan (2.1%, a difference of 0.010%), Italian (2.1%, a difference of 0.14%), Colombian (2.1%, a difference of 0.19%), Belgian (2.1%, a difference of 0.22%), and Immigrants from Norway (2.1%, a difference of 0.25%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Arabs are Czech (2.1%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from South Eastern Asia (2.1%, a difference of 0.010%), Vietnamese (2.1%, a difference of 0.060%), Venezuelan (2.1%, a difference of 0.13%), and Immigrants from Morocco (2.1%, a difference of 0.14%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Vision Disability |
Syrians | 87.5 /100 | #133 | Excellent 2.1% |
Venezuelans | 87.2 /100 | #134 | Excellent 2.1% |
Vietnamese | 86.7 /100 | #135 | Excellent 2.1% |
Czechs | 86.3 /100 | #136 | Excellent 2.1% |
Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 86.3 /100 | #137 | Excellent 2.1% |
Arabs | 86.3 /100 | #138 | Excellent 2.1% |
Immigrants | Morocco | 85.2 /100 | #139 | Excellent 2.1% |
Immigrants | Netherlands | 84.2 /100 | #140 | Excellent 2.1% |
Sierra Leoneans | 84.1 /100 | #141 | Excellent 2.1% |
South Americans | 82.8 /100 | #142 | Excellent 2.1% |
Immigrants | Sierra Leone | 82.8 /100 | #143 | Excellent 2.1% |
Ukrainians | 81.9 /100 | #144 | Excellent 2.1% |
Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 81.5 /100 | #145 | Excellent 2.1% |
Italians | 79.7 /100 | #146 | Good 2.1% |
Immigrants | Sudan | 78.4 /100 | #147 | Good 2.1% |
Finns | 78.3 /100 | #148 | Good 2.1% |
Colombians | 76.2 /100 | #149 | Good 2.1% |
Belgians | 75.9 /100 | #150 | Good 2.1% |
Immigrants | Norway | 75.5 /100 | #151 | Good 2.1% |
Immigrants | Southern Europe | 74.6 /100 | #152 | Good 2.1% |
Immigrants | South America | 73.8 /100 | #153 | Good 2.1% |