Czech vs Jordanian Self-Care Disability
COMPARE
Czech
Jordanian
Self-Care Disability
Self-Care Disability Comparison
Czechs
Jordanians
2.3%
SELF-CARE DISABILITY
99.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
46th/ 347
METRIC RANK
2.3%
SELF-CARE DISABILITY
99.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
47th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Czech vs Jordanian Self-Care Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 483,678,458 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Czechs and percentage of population with self-care disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.424 and weighted average of 2.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 166,373,634 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Jordanians and percentage of population with self-care disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.180 and weighted average of 2.3%, a difference of 0.23%.
Self-Care Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Czech | Jordanian |
| Minimum | 0.83% | 0.31% |
| Maximum | 9.4% | 3.7% |
| Range | 8.5% | 3.4% |
| Mean | 2.9% | 2.1% |
| Median | 2.6% | 2.2% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.1% | 1.8% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 3.2% | 2.5% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.1% | 0.75% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.4% | 0.69% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.4% | 0.68% |
Demographics Similar to Czechs and Jordanians by Self-Care Disability
In terms of self-care disability, the demographic groups most similar to Czechs are Norwegian (2.3%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from South Africa (2.3%, a difference of 0.13%), Immigrants from Pakistan (2.3%, a difference of 0.17%), Immigrants from Uganda (2.3%, a difference of 0.22%), and Immigrants from Malaysia (2.3%, a difference of 0.27%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Jordanians are Immigrants from Malaysia (2.3%, a difference of 0.040%), Latvian (2.3%, a difference of 0.22%), Immigrants from Brazil (2.3%, a difference of 0.24%), Norwegian (2.3%, a difference of 0.31%), and Immigrants from South Africa (2.3%, a difference of 0.35%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Self-Care Disability |
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.9 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 2.3% |
| Immigrants | Sweden | 99.9 /100 | #37 | Exceptional 2.3% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Africa | 99.9 /100 | #38 | Exceptional 2.3% |
| Immigrants | Bulgaria | 99.8 /100 | #39 | Exceptional 2.3% |
| Iranians | 99.8 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 2.3% |
| Immigrants | Sudan | 99.8 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 2.3% |
| Immigrants | Uganda | 99.8 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 2.3% |
| Immigrants | Pakistan | 99.8 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 2.3% |
| Immigrants | South Africa | 99.8 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 2.3% |
| Norwegians | 99.8 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 2.3% |
| Czechs | 99.8 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 2.3% |
| Jordanians | 99.7 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 2.3% |
| Immigrants | Malaysia | 99.7 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 2.3% |
| Latvians | 99.7 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 2.3% |
| Immigrants | Brazil | 99.7 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 2.3% |
| Kenyans | 99.7 /100 | #51 | Exceptional 2.3% |
| Immigrants | Serbia | 99.6 /100 | #52 | Exceptional 2.3% |
| Australians | 99.6 /100 | #53 | Exceptional 2.3% |
| Argentineans | 99.6 /100 | #54 | Exceptional 2.3% |
| Immigrants | France | 99.6 /100 | #55 | Exceptional 2.3% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 99.6 /100 | #56 | Exceptional 2.3% |