Colombian vs Uruguayan Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Colombian
Uruguayan
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Colombians
Uruguayans
5.8%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
97.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
108th/ 347
METRIC RANK
5.8%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
97.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
107th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Colombian vs Uruguayan Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 419,485,288 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Colombians and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.221 and weighted average of 5.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 144,780,979 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Uruguayans and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.166 and weighted average of 5.8%, a difference of 0.010%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Colombian | Uruguayan |
Minimum | 1.5% | 2.9% |
Maximum | 10.0% | 23.8% |
Range | 8.5% | 20.9% |
Mean | 5.4% | 6.9% |
Median | 5.5% | 5.9% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.5% | 5.3% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 6.2% | 7.7% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.7% | 2.4% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.4% | 4.0% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.4% | 3.9% |
Demographics Similar to Colombians and Uruguayans by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Colombians are Immigrants from Netherlands (5.8%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Morocco (5.8%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Czechoslovakia (5.8%, a difference of 0.14%), Immigrants from Colombia (5.8%, a difference of 0.19%), and New Zealander (5.8%, a difference of 0.24%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Uruguayans are Immigrants from Netherlands (5.8%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Morocco (5.8%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Czechoslovakia (5.8%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from Colombia (5.8%, a difference of 0.21%), and New Zealander (5.8%, a difference of 0.23%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
Immigrants | Somalia | 98.3 /100 | #97 | Exceptional 5.8% |
Immigrants | Lebanon | 98.3 /100 | #98 | Exceptional 5.8% |
Immigrants | Northern Europe | 98.2 /100 | #99 | Exceptional 5.8% |
Immigrants | Serbia | 97.9 /100 | #100 | Exceptional 5.8% |
Immigrants | South America | 97.9 /100 | #101 | Exceptional 5.8% |
Immigrants | Kenya | 97.8 /100 | #102 | Exceptional 5.8% |
Immigrants | Romania | 97.7 /100 | #103 | Exceptional 5.8% |
New Zealanders | 97.6 /100 | #104 | Exceptional 5.8% |
Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 97.4 /100 | #105 | Exceptional 5.8% |
Immigrants | Morocco | 97.3 /100 | #106 | Exceptional 5.8% |
Uruguayans | 97.2 /100 | #107 | Exceptional 5.8% |
Colombians | 97.2 /100 | #108 | Exceptional 5.8% |
Immigrants | Netherlands | 97.1 /100 | #109 | Exceptional 5.8% |
Immigrants | Colombia | 96.7 /100 | #110 | Exceptional 5.8% |
Danes | 96.6 /100 | #111 | Exceptional 5.8% |
South Africans | 96.3 /100 | #112 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Immigrants | Uruguay | 95.6 /100 | #113 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Immigrants | Poland | 95.4 /100 | #114 | Exceptional 5.9% |
South American Indians | 94.8 /100 | #115 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Immigrants | Africa | 94.7 /100 | #116 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 93.6 /100 | #117 | Exceptional 5.9% |