Colombian vs Immigrants from Romania Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Colombian
Immigrants from Romania
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Colombians
Immigrants from Romania
5.8%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
97.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
108th/ 347
METRIC RANK
5.8%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
97.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
103rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Colombian vs Immigrants from Romania Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 419,485,288 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Colombians and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.221 and weighted average of 5.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 256,972,629 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Romania and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.033 and weighted average of 5.8%, a difference of 0.30%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Colombian | Immigrants from Romania |
| Minimum | 1.5% | 0.77% |
| Maximum | 10.0% | 16.3% |
| Range | 8.5% | 15.5% |
| Mean | 5.4% | 6.9% |
| Median | 5.5% | 6.0% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.5% | 5.3% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 6.2% | 7.6% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.7% | 2.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.4% | 3.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.4% | 3.1% |
Demographics Similar to Colombians and Immigrants from Romania by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Colombians are Uruguayan (5.8%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Netherlands (5.8%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Morocco (5.8%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Czechoslovakia (5.8%, a difference of 0.14%), and Immigrants from Colombia (5.8%, a difference of 0.19%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Romania are New Zealander (5.8%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Kenya (5.8%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Serbia (5.8%, a difference of 0.15%), Immigrants from South America (5.8%, a difference of 0.15%), and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia (5.8%, a difference of 0.17%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
| Immigrants | El Salvador | 98.4 /100 | #95 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Salvadorans | 98.4 /100 | #96 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Immigrants | Somalia | 98.3 /100 | #97 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Immigrants | Lebanon | 98.3 /100 | #98 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Immigrants | Northern Europe | 98.2 /100 | #99 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Immigrants | Serbia | 97.9 /100 | #100 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Immigrants | South America | 97.9 /100 | #101 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Immigrants | Kenya | 97.8 /100 | #102 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Immigrants | Romania | 97.7 /100 | #103 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| New Zealanders | 97.6 /100 | #104 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 97.4 /100 | #105 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Immigrants | Morocco | 97.3 /100 | #106 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Uruguayans | 97.2 /100 | #107 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Colombians | 97.2 /100 | #108 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Immigrants | Netherlands | 97.1 /100 | #109 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Immigrants | Colombia | 96.7 /100 | #110 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Danes | 96.6 /100 | #111 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| South Africans | 96.3 /100 | #112 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Immigrants | Uruguay | 95.6 /100 | #113 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Immigrants | Poland | 95.4 /100 | #114 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| South American Indians | 94.8 /100 | #115 | Exceptional 5.9% |