Choctaw vs Paiute Vision Disability
COMPARE
Choctaw
Paiute
Vision Disability
Vision Disability Comparison
Choctaw
Paiute
3.3%
VISION DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
342nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
2.9%
VISION DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
322nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Choctaw vs Paiute Vision Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 269,580,756 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Choctaw and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.290 and weighted average of 3.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 58,384,009 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Paiute and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.042 and weighted average of 2.9%, a difference of 15.5%.
Vision Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Choctaw | Paiute |
| Minimum | 0.24% | 0.39% |
| Maximum | 15.8% | 13.8% |
| Range | 15.5% | 13.4% |
| Mean | 6.0% | 4.5% |
| Median | 5.4% | 3.3% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.2% | 2.4% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 7.0% | 6.0% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.8% | 3.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.6% | 3.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.6% | 3.0% |
Demographics Similar to Choctaw and Paiute by Vision Disability
In terms of vision disability, the demographic groups most similar to Choctaw are Kiowa (3.3%, a difference of 1.4%), Creek (3.2%, a difference of 2.8%), Tsimshian (3.2%, a difference of 3.0%), Chickasaw (3.2%, a difference of 3.7%), and Dutch West Indian (3.2%, a difference of 4.6%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Paiute are Tlingit-Haida (2.9%, a difference of 0.0%), Hopi (2.9%, a difference of 2.0%), Cherokee (2.9%, a difference of 2.0%), Spanish American (2.9%, a difference of 3.2%), and Native/Alaskan (3.0%, a difference of 4.0%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Vision Disability |
| Paiute | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 2.9% |
| Tlingit-Haida | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 2.9% |
| Hopi | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 2.9% |
| Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 2.9% |
| Spanish Americans | 0.0 /100 | #326 | Tragic 2.9% |
| Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #327 | Tragic 3.0% |
| Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 3.0% |
| Apache | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 3.0% |
| Colville | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 3.0% |
| Central American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 3.0% |
| Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 3.1% |
| Cajuns | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 3.1% |
| Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 3.1% |
| Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 3.1% |
| Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 3.1% |
| Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 3.2% |
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 3.2% |
| Tsimshian | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 3.2% |
| Creek | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 3.2% |
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 3.3% |
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 3.3% |