Choctaw vs Houma Vision Disability
COMPARE
Choctaw
Houma
Vision Disability
Vision Disability Comparison
Choctaw
Houma
3.3%
VISION DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
342nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
3.4%
VISION DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
346th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Choctaw vs Houma Vision Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 269,580,756 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Choctaw and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.290 and weighted average of 3.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 36,790,703 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Houma and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.044 and weighted average of 3.4%, a difference of 4.4%.
Vision Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Choctaw | Houma |
Minimum | 0.24% | 1.3% |
Maximum | 15.8% | 9.0% |
Range | 15.5% | 7.8% |
Mean | 6.0% | 3.8% |
Median | 5.4% | 3.6% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.2% | 2.8% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 7.0% | 4.4% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.8% | 1.6% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.6% | 1.6% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.6% | 1.6% |
Demographics Similar to Choctaw and Houma by Vision Disability
In terms of vision disability, the demographic groups most similar to Choctaw are Pima (3.3%, a difference of 1.1%), Pueblo (3.3%, a difference of 1.1%), Kiowa (3.3%, a difference of 1.4%), Lumbee (3.4%, a difference of 2.7%), and Creek (3.2%, a difference of 2.8%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Houma are Lumbee (3.4%, a difference of 1.7%), Pueblo (3.3%, a difference of 3.3%), Pima (3.3%, a difference of 3.3%), Kiowa (3.3%, a difference of 5.9%), and Creek (3.2%, a difference of 7.4%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Vision Disability |
Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 3.0% |
Apache | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 3.0% |
Colville | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 3.0% |
Central American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 3.0% |
Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 3.1% |
Cajuns | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 3.1% |
Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 3.1% |
Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 3.1% |
Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 3.1% |
Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 3.2% |
Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 3.2% |
Tsimshian | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 3.2% |
Creek | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 3.2% |
Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 3.3% |
Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 3.3% |
Pima | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 3.3% |
Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 3.3% |
Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 3.4% |
Houma | 0.0 /100 | #346 | Tragic 3.4% |
Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #347 | Tragic 3.9% |