Chinese vs Native Hawaiian Self-Care Disability
COMPARE
Chinese
Native Hawaiian
Self-Care Disability
Self-Care Disability Comparison
Chinese
Native Hawaiians
2.6%
SELF-CARE DISABILITY
2.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
226th/ 347
METRIC RANK
2.6%
SELF-CARE DISABILITY
5.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
211th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Chinese vs Native Hawaiian Self-Care Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 64,799,357 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Chinese and percentage of population with self-care disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.418 and weighted average of 2.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 331,613,173 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Native Hawaiians and percentage of population with self-care disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.246 and weighted average of 2.6%, a difference of 0.69%.
Self-Care Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Chinese | Native Hawaiian |
| Minimum | 0.55% | 0.72% |
| Maximum | 8.0% | 6.3% |
| Range | 7.4% | 5.6% |
| Mean | 2.8% | 2.7% |
| Median | 2.5% | 2.5% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.2% | 2.1% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 3.0% | 3.1% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 0.82% | 0.98% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.3% | 1.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.3% | 1.1% |
Demographics Similar to Chinese and Native Hawaiians by Self-Care Disability
In terms of self-care disability, the demographic groups most similar to Chinese are Immigrants from Philippines (2.6%, a difference of 0.080%), Guatemalan (2.6%, a difference of 0.090%), Iraqi (2.6%, a difference of 0.10%), Osage (2.6%, a difference of 0.27%), and Spaniard (2.6%, a difference of 0.32%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Native Hawaiians are Samoan (2.6%, a difference of 0.020%), Ecuadorian (2.6%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from Honduras (2.6%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from Thailand (2.6%, a difference of 0.16%), and White/Caucasian (2.6%, a difference of 0.19%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Self-Care Disability |
| Central Americans | 8.7 /100 | #208 | Tragic 2.5% |
| Malaysians | 7.7 /100 | #209 | Tragic 2.5% |
| Panamanians | 6.4 /100 | #210 | Tragic 2.5% |
| Native Hawaiians | 5.1 /100 | #211 | Tragic 2.6% |
| Samoans | 5.1 /100 | #212 | Tragic 2.6% |
| Ecuadorians | 4.7 /100 | #213 | Tragic 2.6% |
| Immigrants | Honduras | 4.7 /100 | #214 | Tragic 2.6% |
| Immigrants | Thailand | 4.5 /100 | #215 | Tragic 2.6% |
| Whites/Caucasians | 4.4 /100 | #216 | Tragic 2.6% |
| Celtics | 4.4 /100 | #217 | Tragic 2.6% |
| Scotch-Irish | 4.1 /100 | #218 | Tragic 2.6% |
| Immigrants | Moldova | 4.0 /100 | #219 | Tragic 2.6% |
| Sub-Saharan Africans | 4.0 /100 | #220 | Tragic 2.6% |
| Hondurans | 3.8 /100 | #221 | Tragic 2.6% |
| Spaniards | 3.8 /100 | #222 | Tragic 2.6% |
| French Canadians | 3.8 /100 | #223 | Tragic 2.6% |
| Osage | 3.6 /100 | #224 | Tragic 2.6% |
| Iraqis | 3.2 /100 | #225 | Tragic 2.6% |
| Chinese | 2.9 /100 | #226 | Tragic 2.6% |
| Immigrants | Philippines | 2.7 /100 | #227 | Tragic 2.6% |
| Guatemalans | 2.7 /100 | #228 | Tragic 2.6% |