Chinese vs Guatemalan Self-Care Disability
COMPARE
Chinese
Guatemalan
Self-Care Disability
Self-Care Disability Comparison
Chinese
Guatemalans
2.6%
SELF-CARE DISABILITY
2.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
226th/ 347
METRIC RANK
2.6%
SELF-CARE DISABILITY
2.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
228th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Chinese vs Guatemalan Self-Care Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 64,799,357 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Chinese and percentage of population with self-care disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.418 and weighted average of 2.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 408,997,178 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Guatemalans and percentage of population with self-care disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.053 and weighted average of 2.6%, a difference of 0.090%.
Self-Care Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Chinese | Guatemalan |
| Minimum | 0.55% | 0.26% |
| Maximum | 8.0% | 5.6% |
| Range | 7.4% | 5.3% |
| Mean | 2.8% | 2.6% |
| Median | 2.5% | 2.6% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.2% | 2.1% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 3.0% | 2.8% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 0.82% | 0.73% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.3% | 0.92% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.3% | 0.91% |
Demographics Similar to Chinese and Guatemalans by Self-Care Disability
In terms of self-care disability, the demographic groups most similar to Chinese are Immigrants from Philippines (2.6%, a difference of 0.080%), Iraqi (2.6%, a difference of 0.10%), Guamanian/Chamorro (2.6%, a difference of 0.16%), Immigrants from Ecuador (2.6%, a difference of 0.16%), and Osage (2.6%, a difference of 0.27%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Guatemalans are Immigrants from Philippines (2.6%, a difference of 0.010%), Guamanian/Chamorro (2.6%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Ecuador (2.6%, a difference of 0.080%), Iraqi (2.6%, a difference of 0.19%), and Immigrants from Guatemala (2.6%, a difference of 0.22%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Self-Care Disability |
| Celtics | 4.4 /100 | #217 | Tragic 2.6% |
| Scotch-Irish | 4.1 /100 | #218 | Tragic 2.6% |
| Immigrants | Moldova | 4.0 /100 | #219 | Tragic 2.6% |
| Sub-Saharan Africans | 4.0 /100 | #220 | Tragic 2.6% |
| Hondurans | 3.8 /100 | #221 | Tragic 2.6% |
| Spaniards | 3.8 /100 | #222 | Tragic 2.6% |
| French Canadians | 3.8 /100 | #223 | Tragic 2.6% |
| Osage | 3.6 /100 | #224 | Tragic 2.6% |
| Iraqis | 3.2 /100 | #225 | Tragic 2.6% |
| Chinese | 2.9 /100 | #226 | Tragic 2.6% |
| Immigrants | Philippines | 2.7 /100 | #227 | Tragic 2.6% |
| Guatemalans | 2.7 /100 | #228 | Tragic 2.6% |
| Guamanians/Chamorros | 2.5 /100 | #229 | Tragic 2.6% |
| Immigrants | Ecuador | 2.5 /100 | #230 | Tragic 2.6% |
| Immigrants | Guatemala | 2.2 /100 | #231 | Tragic 2.6% |
| Albanians | 2.2 /100 | #232 | Tragic 2.6% |
| Liberians | 2.1 /100 | #233 | Tragic 2.6% |
| Vietnamese | 2.1 /100 | #234 | Tragic 2.6% |
| Bahamians | 2.0 /100 | #235 | Tragic 2.6% |
| Bermudans | 1.9 /100 | #236 | Tragic 2.6% |
| Immigrants | Senegal | 1.6 /100 | #237 | Tragic 2.6% |