Celtic vs Immigrants from Micronesia Vision Disability
COMPARE
Celtic
Immigrants from Micronesia
Vision Disability
Vision Disability Comparison
Celtics
Immigrants from Micronesia
2.4%
VISION DISABILITY
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
269th/ 347
METRIC RANK
2.4%
VISION DISABILITY
0.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
252nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Celtic vs Immigrants from Micronesia Vision Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 168,807,792 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Celtics and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.062 and weighted average of 2.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 61,592,184 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Micronesia and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.200 and weighted average of 2.4%, a difference of 2.1%.
Vision Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Celtic | Immigrants from Micronesia |
| Minimum | 0.40% | 0.53% |
| Maximum | 12.3% | 7.1% |
| Range | 11.9% | 6.5% |
| Mean | 3.6% | 2.7% |
| Median | 2.8% | 2.5% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.3% | 1.9% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 4.2% | 3.2% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.9% | 1.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.2% | 1.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.2% | 1.5% |
Demographics Similar to Celtics and Immigrants from Micronesia by Vision Disability
In terms of vision disability, the demographic groups most similar to Celtics are Cuban (2.4%, a difference of 0.010%), Senegalese (2.4%, a difference of 0.27%), Ute (2.4%, a difference of 0.36%), Mexican American Indian (2.4%, a difference of 0.37%), and Immigrants from Jamaica (2.4%, a difference of 0.41%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Micronesia are Japanese (2.4%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Laos (2.4%, a difference of 0.32%), Haitian (2.4%, a difference of 0.35%), Immigrants from Guatemala (2.4%, a difference of 0.38%), and Bangladeshi (2.3%, a difference of 0.43%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Vision Disability |
| Bangladeshis | 0.5 /100 | #250 | Tragic 2.3% |
| Immigrants | Laos | 0.4 /100 | #251 | Tragic 2.4% |
| Immigrants | Micronesia | 0.3 /100 | #252 | Tragic 2.4% |
| Japanese | 0.3 /100 | #253 | Tragic 2.4% |
| Haitians | 0.3 /100 | #254 | Tragic 2.4% |
| Immigrants | Guatemala | 0.3 /100 | #255 | Tragic 2.4% |
| Immigrants | Haiti | 0.2 /100 | #256 | Tragic 2.4% |
| West Indians | 0.2 /100 | #257 | Tragic 2.4% |
| British West Indians | 0.2 /100 | #258 | Tragic 2.4% |
| Whites/Caucasians | 0.2 /100 | #259 | Tragic 2.4% |
| Belizeans | 0.2 /100 | #260 | Tragic 2.4% |
| Fijians | 0.1 /100 | #261 | Tragic 2.4% |
| Jamaicans | 0.1 /100 | #262 | Tragic 2.4% |
| Immigrants | Belize | 0.1 /100 | #263 | Tragic 2.4% |
| Immigrants | Liberia | 0.1 /100 | #264 | Tragic 2.4% |
| Immigrants | Jamaica | 0.1 /100 | #265 | Tragic 2.4% |
| Mexican American Indians | 0.1 /100 | #266 | Tragic 2.4% |
| Ute | 0.1 /100 | #267 | Tragic 2.4% |
| Senegalese | 0.1 /100 | #268 | Tragic 2.4% |
| Celtics | 0.1 /100 | #269 | Tragic 2.4% |
| Cubans | 0.1 /100 | #270 | Tragic 2.4% |