Celtic vs British West Indian Vision Disability
COMPARE
Celtic
British West Indian
Vision Disability
Vision Disability Comparison
Celtics
British West Indians
2.4%
VISION DISABILITY
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
269th/ 347
METRIC RANK
2.4%
VISION DISABILITY
0.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
258th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Celtic vs British West Indian Vision Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 168,807,792 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Celtics and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.062 and weighted average of 2.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 152,656,030 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of British West Indians and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.097 and weighted average of 2.4%, a difference of 1.2%.
Vision Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Celtic | British West Indian |
Minimum | 0.40% | 0.69% |
Maximum | 12.3% | 4.9% |
Range | 11.9% | 4.2% |
Mean | 3.6% | 2.5% |
Median | 2.8% | 2.5% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.3% | 2.1% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 4.2% | 2.9% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.9% | 0.88% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.2% | 0.81% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.2% | 0.80% |
Demographics Similar to Celtics and British West Indians by Vision Disability
In terms of vision disability, the demographic groups most similar to Celtics are Cuban (2.4%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from the Azores (2.4%, a difference of 0.16%), Senegalese (2.4%, a difference of 0.27%), Spaniard (2.4%, a difference of 0.27%), and Ute (2.4%, a difference of 0.36%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to British West Indians are White/Caucasian (2.4%, a difference of 0.010%), West Indian (2.4%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Haiti (2.4%, a difference of 0.10%), Belizean (2.4%, a difference of 0.18%), and Fijian (2.4%, a difference of 0.40%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Vision Disability |
Japanese | 0.3 /100 | #253 | Tragic 2.4% |
Haitians | 0.3 /100 | #254 | Tragic 2.4% |
Immigrants | Guatemala | 0.3 /100 | #255 | Tragic 2.4% |
Immigrants | Haiti | 0.2 /100 | #256 | Tragic 2.4% |
West Indians | 0.2 /100 | #257 | Tragic 2.4% |
British West Indians | 0.2 /100 | #258 | Tragic 2.4% |
Whites/Caucasians | 0.2 /100 | #259 | Tragic 2.4% |
Belizeans | 0.2 /100 | #260 | Tragic 2.4% |
Fijians | 0.1 /100 | #261 | Tragic 2.4% |
Jamaicans | 0.1 /100 | #262 | Tragic 2.4% |
Immigrants | Belize | 0.1 /100 | #263 | Tragic 2.4% |
Immigrants | Liberia | 0.1 /100 | #264 | Tragic 2.4% |
Immigrants | Jamaica | 0.1 /100 | #265 | Tragic 2.4% |
Mexican American Indians | 0.1 /100 | #266 | Tragic 2.4% |
Ute | 0.1 /100 | #267 | Tragic 2.4% |
Senegalese | 0.1 /100 | #268 | Tragic 2.4% |
Celtics | 0.1 /100 | #269 | Tragic 2.4% |
Cubans | 0.1 /100 | #270 | Tragic 2.4% |
Immigrants | Azores | 0.1 /100 | #271 | Tragic 2.4% |
Spaniards | 0.1 /100 | #272 | Tragic 2.4% |
Immigrants | Bahamas | 0.1 /100 | #273 | Tragic 2.4% |