Afghan vs Immigrants from Kazakhstan Vision Disability
COMPARE
Afghan
Immigrants from Kazakhstan
Vision Disability
Vision Disability Comparison
Afghans
Immigrants from Kazakhstan
2.0%
VISION DISABILITY
99.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
50th/ 347
METRIC RANK
2.0%
VISION DISABILITY
98.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
70th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Afghan vs Immigrants from Kazakhstan Vision Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 148,842,568 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Afghans and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.546 and weighted average of 2.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 124,421,317 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Kazakhstan and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.051 and weighted average of 2.0%, a difference of 1.8%.
Vision Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Afghan | Immigrants from Kazakhstan |
| Minimum | 0.32% | 0.47% |
| Maximum | 7.0% | 5.1% |
| Range | 6.7% | 4.6% |
| Mean | 2.1% | 2.0% |
| Median | 1.9% | 1.9% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 1.5% | 1.5% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 2.3% | 2.3% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 0.76% | 0.85% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.0% | 0.91% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.0% | 0.90% |
Demographics Similar to Afghans and Immigrants from Kazakhstan by Vision Disability
In terms of vision disability, the demographic groups most similar to Afghans are Tongan (2.0%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Serbia (2.0%, a difference of 0.40%), Immigrants from Belarus (2.0%, a difference of 0.51%), Macedonian (2.0%, a difference of 0.55%), and Laotian (2.0%, a difference of 0.60%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Kazakhstan are Russian (2.0%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Czechoslovakia (2.0%, a difference of 0.19%), Immigrants from Northern Africa (2.0%, a difference of 0.29%), Immigrants from Argentina (2.0%, a difference of 0.40%), and Maltese (2.0%, a difference of 0.46%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Vision Disability |
| Afghans | 99.5 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Tongans | 99.5 /100 | #51 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Immigrants | Serbia | 99.4 /100 | #52 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Immigrants | Belarus | 99.3 /100 | #53 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Macedonians | 99.3 /100 | #54 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Laotians | 99.3 /100 | #55 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Jordanians | 99.2 /100 | #56 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Somalis | 99.2 /100 | #57 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Immigrants | Saudi Arabia | 99.2 /100 | #58 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Argentineans | 99.1 /100 | #59 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Immigrants | Romania | 99.1 /100 | #60 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Immigrants | Belgium | 99.1 /100 | #61 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Immigrants | Russia | 99.1 /100 | #62 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Armenians | 99.0 /100 | #63 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Immigrants | Greece | 99.0 /100 | #64 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Maltese | 98.9 /100 | #65 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Immigrants | Argentina | 98.9 /100 | #66 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Immigrants | Northern Africa | 98.8 /100 | #67 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 98.7 /100 | #68 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Russians | 98.6 /100 | #69 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 98.6 /100 | #70 | Exceptional 2.0% |