Afghan vs Immigrants from Argentina Vision Disability
COMPARE
Afghan
Immigrants from Argentina
Vision Disability
Vision Disability Comparison
Afghans
Immigrants from Argentina
2.0%
VISION DISABILITY
99.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
50th/ 347
METRIC RANK
2.0%
VISION DISABILITY
98.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
66th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Afghan vs Immigrants from Argentina Vision Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 148,842,568 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Afghans and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.546 and weighted average of 2.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 264,359,612 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Argentina and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.078 and weighted average of 2.0%, a difference of 1.5%.
Vision Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Afghan | Immigrants from Argentina |
| Minimum | 0.32% | 0.68% |
| Maximum | 7.0% | 5.6% |
| Range | 6.7% | 4.9% |
| Mean | 2.1% | 2.2% |
| Median | 1.9% | 2.0% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 1.5% | 1.6% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 2.3% | 2.4% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 0.76% | 0.82% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.0% | 1.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.0% | 0.99% |
Demographics Similar to Afghans and Immigrants from Argentina by Vision Disability
In terms of vision disability, the demographic groups most similar to Afghans are Latvian (2.0%, a difference of 0.060%), Tongan (2.0%, a difference of 0.090%), Israeli (2.0%, a difference of 0.13%), Immigrants from Serbia (2.0%, a difference of 0.40%), and Immigrants from Belarus (2.0%, a difference of 0.51%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Argentina are Maltese (2.0%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Northern Africa (2.0%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Greece (2.0%, a difference of 0.13%), Immigrants from Czechoslovakia (2.0%, a difference of 0.21%), and Armenian (2.0%, a difference of 0.26%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Vision Disability |
| Israelis | 99.6 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Latvians | 99.5 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Afghans | 99.5 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Tongans | 99.5 /100 | #51 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Immigrants | Serbia | 99.4 /100 | #52 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Immigrants | Belarus | 99.3 /100 | #53 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Macedonians | 99.3 /100 | #54 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Laotians | 99.3 /100 | #55 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Jordanians | 99.2 /100 | #56 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Somalis | 99.2 /100 | #57 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Immigrants | Saudi Arabia | 99.2 /100 | #58 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Argentineans | 99.1 /100 | #59 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Immigrants | Romania | 99.1 /100 | #60 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Immigrants | Belgium | 99.1 /100 | #61 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Immigrants | Russia | 99.1 /100 | #62 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Armenians | 99.0 /100 | #63 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Immigrants | Greece | 99.0 /100 | #64 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Maltese | 98.9 /100 | #65 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Immigrants | Argentina | 98.9 /100 | #66 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Immigrants | Northern Africa | 98.8 /100 | #67 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 98.7 /100 | #68 | Exceptional 2.0% |