New Zealander vs Hmong Community Comparison
COMPARE
New Zealander
Hmong
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
New Zealanders
Hmong
8,769
SOCIAL INDEX
85.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
50th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
4,737
SOCIAL INDEX
44.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
196th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Hmong Integration in New Zealander Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 20,895,172 people shows a perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Hmong within New Zealander communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 1.000. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in New Zealanders within a typical geography, there is an increase of 1.326% in Hmong. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 New Zealanders corresponds to an increase of 1,325.9 Hmong.
New Zealander vs Hmong Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($50,575 compared to $38,120, a difference of 32.7%), median male earnings ($61,199 compared to $48,254, a difference of 26.8%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($111,286 compared to $88,115, a difference of 26.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.7% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 0.10%), householder income under 25 years ($53,294 compared to $49,364, a difference of 8.0%), and householder income over 65 years ($67,333 compared to $56,339, a difference of 19.5%).
Income Metric | New Zealander | Hmong |
Per Capita Income | Exceptional $50,575 | Tragic $38,120 |
Median Family Income | Exceptional $115,230 | Tragic $91,296 |
Median Household Income | Exceptional $95,146 | Tragic $75,839 |
Median Earnings | Exceptional $51,246 | Tragic $42,111 |
Median Male Earnings | Exceptional $61,199 | Tragic $48,254 |
Median Female Earnings | Exceptional $42,446 | Tragic $35,498 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Exceptional $53,294 | Tragic $49,364 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Exceptional $105,085 | Tragic $84,258 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Exceptional $111,286 | Tragic $88,115 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Exceptional $67,333 | Tragic $56,339 |
Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 27.7% | Tragic 27.7% |
New Zealander vs Hmong Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in family poverty (8.1% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 12.8%), child poverty among girls under 16 (15.6% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 12.3%), and married-couple family poverty (4.4% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 11.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.7% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 2.0%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.0% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 3.8%), and single father poverty (16.6% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 4.7%).
Poverty Metric | New Zealander | Hmong |
Poverty | Excellent 11.7% | Poor 12.8% |
Families | Exceptional 8.1% | Average 9.1% |
Males | Excellent 10.8% | Poor 11.6% |
Females | Exceptional 12.7% | Fair 13.9% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 21.7% | Average 20.0% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Excellent 13.1% | Fair 13.9% |
Children Under 5 years | Good 16.6% | Tragic 18.5% |
Children Under 16 years | Excellent 15.3% | Poor 17.1% |
Boys Under 16 years | Excellent 15.7% | Fair 16.6% |
Girls Under 16 years | Excellent 15.6% | Poor 17.5% |
Single Males | Poor 13.2% | Tragic 14.2% |
Single Females | Average 21.0% | Tragic 23.1% |
Single Fathers | Poor 16.6% | Exceptional 15.9% |
Single Mothers | Average 29.1% | Tragic 31.2% |
Married Couples | Exceptional 4.4% | Excellent 5.0% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Exceptional 10.0% | Exceptional 10.4% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Excellent 11.7% | Good 12.0% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Exceptional 9.9% | Excellent 10.9% |
New Zealander vs Hmong Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.1% compared to 13.7%, a difference of 69.1%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 26.3%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 22.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment (4.9% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 0.97%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.6% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 1.5%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.8% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 2.9%).
Unemployment Metric | New Zealander | Hmong |
Unemployment | Exceptional 4.9% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Males | Exceptional 5.0% | Tragic 5.5% |
Females | Exceptional 5.0% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 11.2% | Exceptional 10.8% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 16.8% | Exceptional 16.3% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 9.9% | Exceptional 9.4% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Exceptional 6.0% | Exceptional 5.7% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Excellent 5.3% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Exceptional 4.5% | Tragic 5.0% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.4% | Exceptional 3.7% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Tragic 5.7% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Poor 4.9% | Exceptional 4.0% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Good 5.3% | Exceptional 4.2% |
Seniors > 65 | Excellent 5.1% | Exceptional 4.2% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 8.1% | Tragic 13.7% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Exceptional 7.2% | Exceptional 6.7% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 8.6% | Exceptional 8.7% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Good 5.3% | Exceptional 4.5% |
New Zealander vs Hmong Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 82.4%, a difference of 3.1%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.7% compared to 64.1%, a difference of 2.5%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.7% compared to 77.9%, a difference of 2.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (82.6% compared to 81.7%, a difference of 1.1%), in labor force | age 25-29 (85.0% compared to 83.7%, a difference of 1.6%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (75.2% compared to 76.5%, a difference of 1.7%).
Labor Participation Metric | New Zealander | Hmong |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Exceptional 65.7% | Tragic 64.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Good 79.7% | Tragic 77.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 38.0% | Exceptional 38.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Good 75.2% | Exceptional 76.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Exceptional 85.0% | Tragic 83.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Excellent 85.0% | Tragic 82.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Poor 84.1% | Tragic 82.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Fair 82.6% | Tragic 81.7% |
New Zealander vs Hmong Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.6% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 13.6%), single father households (2.1% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 13.3%), and births to unmarried women (30.3% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 9.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (47.2% compared to 47.0%, a difference of 0.55%), currently married (47.4% compared to 47.1%, a difference of 0.64%), and average family size (3.15 compared to 3.21, a difference of 1.7%).
Family Structure Metric | New Zealander | Hmong |
Family Households | Tragic 62.9% | Exceptional 64.9% |
Family Households with Children | Tragic 27.1% | Exceptional 28.6% |
Married-couple Households | Excellent 47.2% | Good 47.0% |
Average Family Size | Tragic 3.15 | Fair 3.21 |
Single Father Households | Exceptional 2.1% | Fair 2.4% |
Single Mother Households | Exceptional 5.6% | Fair 6.4% |
Currently Married | Excellent 47.4% | Good 47.1% |
Divorced or Separated | Excellent 11.9% | Tragic 12.3% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Excellent 30.3% | Exceptional 27.7% |
New Zealander vs Hmong Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 7.5%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.4% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 3.0%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (56.7% compared to 57.8%, a difference of 2.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.1% compared to 89.6%, a difference of 0.47%), no vehicles in household (10.2% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 1.8%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (56.7% compared to 57.8%, a difference of 2.0%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | New Zealander | Hmong |
No Vehicles Available | Good 10.2% | Average 10.4% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Good 90.1% | Average 89.6% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 56.7% | Exceptional 57.8% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 20.4% | Exceptional 21.0% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Good 6.5% | Exceptional 7.0% |
New Zealander vs Hmong Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.5% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 59.5%), professional degree (6.0% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 59.0%), and master's degree (18.3% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 36.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 5th grade (97.9% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.32%), 6th grade (97.7% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 0.32%), and 4th grade (98.0% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.33%).
Education Level Metric | New Zealander | Hmong |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.7% | Excellent 1.9% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.4% | Good 98.1% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.4% | Good 98.1% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.4% | Good 98.0% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Good 98.0% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Excellent 97.9% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.0% | Excellent 97.7% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 97.9% | Exceptional 97.6% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.7% | Exceptional 97.4% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 96.8% | Exceptional 96.4% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 96.6% | Excellent 96.1% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 95.9% | Excellent 95.2% |
10th Grade | Exceptional 95.0% | Excellent 94.1% |
11th Grade | Exceptional 94.0% | Good 92.8% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Exceptional 92.8% | Average 91.3% |
High School Diploma | Exceptional 91.1% | Average 89.1% |
GED/Equivalency | Exceptional 88.0% | Poor 84.9% |
College, Under 1 year | Exceptional 70.2% | Tragic 63.5% |
College, 1 year or more | Exceptional 64.6% | Tragic 57.2% |
Associate's Degree | Exceptional 51.8% | Tragic 43.4% |
Bachelor's Degree | Exceptional 44.0% | Tragic 34.8% |
Master's Degree | Exceptional 18.3% | Tragic 13.4% |
Professional Degree | Exceptional 6.0% | Tragic 3.7% |
Doctorate Degree | Exceptional 2.5% | Tragic 1.6% |
New Zealander vs Hmong Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (11.0% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 19.8%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.4% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 17.4%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.0% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 14.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 4.0%), disability age over 75 (46.2% compared to 48.2%, a difference of 4.4%), and cognitive disability (17.4% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 5.8%).
Disability Metric | New Zealander | Hmong |
Disability | Excellent 11.5% | Tragic 12.8% |
Males | Average 11.2% | Tragic 12.5% |
Females | Exceptional 11.7% | Tragic 13.1% |
Age | Under 5 years | Excellent 1.2% | Exceptional 1.1% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Exceptional 5.4% | Tragic 6.3% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 7.0% | Tragic 8.1% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Good 11.0% | Tragic 13.1% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Good 22.9% | Tragic 25.7% |
Age | Over 75 years | Exceptional 46.2% | Tragic 48.2% |
Vision | Excellent 2.1% | Tragic 2.3% |
Hearing | Tragic 3.2% | Tragic 3.4% |
Cognitive | Fair 17.4% | Tragic 18.4% |
Ambulatory | Exceptional 5.8% | Tragic 6.6% |
Self-Care | Exceptional 2.3% | Excellent 2.4% |