Alaskan Athabascan vs Hmong Community Comparison
COMPARE
Alaskan Athabascan
Hmong
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Alaskan Athabascans
Hmong
2,687
SOCIAL INDEX
24.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
246th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
4,737
SOCIAL INDEX
44.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
196th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Hmong Integration in Alaskan Athabascan Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 7,803,001 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Hmong within Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.704. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Alaskan Athabascans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.023% in Hmong. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Alaskan Athabascans corresponds to an increase of 22.5 Hmong.
Alaskan Athabascan vs Hmong Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($62,330 compared to $56,339, a difference of 10.6%), wage/income gap (25.8% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 7.5%), and median female earnings ($37,905 compared to $35,498, a difference of 6.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median household income ($76,383 compared to $75,839, a difference of 0.72%), per capita income ($39,163 compared to $38,120, a difference of 2.7%), and median earnings ($43,393 compared to $42,111, a difference of 3.0%).
Income Metric | Alaskan Athabascan | Hmong |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $39,163 | Tragic $38,120 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $94,429 | Tragic $91,296 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $76,383 | Tragic $75,839 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $43,393 | Tragic $42,111 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $49,748 | Tragic $48,254 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $37,905 | Tragic $35,498 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Fair $51,713 | Tragic $49,364 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $88,446 | Tragic $84,258 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $90,951 | Tragic $88,115 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Excellent $62,330 | Tragic $56,339 |
Wage/Income Gap | Average 25.8% | Tragic 27.7% |
Alaskan Athabascan vs Hmong Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 25-34 year olds (19.1% compared to 13.9%, a difference of 37.3%), receiving food stamps (14.7% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 34.6%), and married-couple family poverty (6.1% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 21.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.6% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 2.0%), child poverty under the age of 16 (17.5% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 2.2%), and single female poverty (23.6% compared to 23.1%, a difference of 2.3%).
Poverty Metric | Alaskan Athabascan | Hmong |
Poverty | Tragic 13.6% | Poor 12.8% |
Families | Tragic 10.1% | Average 9.1% |
Males | Tragic 12.8% | Poor 11.6% |
Females | Tragic 14.4% | Fair 13.9% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 22.5% | Average 20.0% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 19.1% | Fair 13.9% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 21.8% | Tragic 18.5% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 17.5% | Poor 17.1% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 17.6% | Fair 16.6% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 18.3% | Poor 17.5% |
Single Males | Tragic 16.1% | Tragic 14.2% |
Single Females | Tragic 23.6% | Tragic 23.1% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 18.1% | Exceptional 15.9% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 30.3% | Tragic 31.2% |
Married Couples | Tragic 6.1% | Excellent 5.0% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Good 10.6% | Exceptional 10.4% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Tragic 13.4% | Good 12.0% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 14.7% | Excellent 10.9% |
Alaskan Athabascan vs Hmong Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (8.5% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 126.5%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (8.4% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 108.8%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (10.8% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 90.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.5% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 2.6%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.7% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 8.7%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (12.2% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 12.7%).
Unemployment Metric | Alaskan Athabascan | Hmong |
Unemployment | Tragic 7.7% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Males | Tragic 9.8% | Tragic 5.5% |
Females | Tragic 6.1% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Youth < 25 | Tragic 12.2% | Exceptional 10.8% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Fair 17.7% | Exceptional 16.3% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Tragic 11.6% | Exceptional 9.4% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Tragic 10.8% | Exceptional 5.7% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 7.0% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 8.6% | Tragic 5.0% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Tragic 8.5% | Exceptional 3.7% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Tragic 7.1% | Tragic 5.7% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Tragic 8.4% | Exceptional 4.0% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 7.4% | Exceptional 4.2% |
Seniors > 65 | Tragic 7.0% | Exceptional 4.2% |
Seniors > 75 | Tragic 11.0% | Tragic 13.7% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 9.1% | Exceptional 6.7% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 8.5% | Exceptional 8.7% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Tragic 6.3% | Exceptional 4.5% |
Alaskan Athabascan vs Hmong Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (45.2% compared to 38.7%, a difference of 16.7%), in labor force | age 20-24 (79.1% compared to 76.5%, a difference of 3.4%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (82.3% compared to 83.7%, a difference of 1.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (81.8% compared to 81.7%, a difference of 0.060%), in labor force | age 30-34 (81.7% compared to 82.4%, a difference of 0.89%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.8% compared to 64.1%, a difference of 1.1%).
Labor Participation Metric | Alaskan Athabascan | Hmong |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Poor 64.8% | Tragic 64.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 76.9% | Tragic 77.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 45.2% | Exceptional 38.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Exceptional 79.1% | Exceptional 76.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 82.3% | Tragic 83.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 81.7% | Tragic 82.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 81.3% | Tragic 82.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 81.8% | Tragic 81.7% |
Alaskan Athabascan vs Hmong Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.4% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 42.5%), births to unmarried women (37.7% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 36.0%), and single mother households (7.3% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 14.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.27 compared to 3.21, a difference of 1.8%), family households with children (27.6% compared to 28.6%, a difference of 3.8%), and family households (61.8% compared to 64.9%, a difference of 5.0%).
Family Structure Metric | Alaskan Athabascan | Hmong |
Family Households | Tragic 61.8% | Exceptional 64.9% |
Family Households with Children | Good 27.6% | Exceptional 28.6% |
Married-couple Households | Tragic 43.6% | Good 47.0% |
Average Family Size | Exceptional 3.27 | Fair 3.21 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 3.4% | Fair 2.4% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 7.3% | Fair 6.4% |
Currently Married | Tragic 44.6% | Good 47.1% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 13.1% | Tragic 12.3% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 37.7% | Exceptional 27.7% |
Alaskan Athabascan vs Hmong Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (15.6% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 50.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (8.1% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 15.7%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (55.2% compared to 57.8%, a difference of 4.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (86.0% compared to 89.6%, a difference of 4.3%), 3 or more vehicles in household (21.9% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 4.6%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (55.2% compared to 57.8%, a difference of 4.8%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Alaskan Athabascan | Hmong |
No Vehicles Available | Tragic 15.6% | Average 10.4% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 86.0% | Average 89.6% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Average 55.2% | Exceptional 57.8% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 21.9% | Exceptional 21.0% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 8.1% | Exceptional 7.0% |
Alaskan Athabascan vs Hmong Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 32.9%), bachelor's degree (28.8% compared to 34.8%, a difference of 20.6%), and associate's degree (36.5% compared to 43.4%, a difference of 19.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (85.3% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 0.48%), 4th grade (98.4% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.74%), and nursery school (98.8% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.75%).
Education Level Metric | Alaskan Athabascan | Hmong |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.5% | Excellent 1.9% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.8% | Good 98.1% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.8% | Good 98.1% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.8% | Good 98.0% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.7% | Good 98.0% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.7% | Excellent 97.9% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.4% | Excellent 97.7% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Exceptional 97.6% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 98.1% | Exceptional 97.4% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 97.6% | Exceptional 96.4% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 97.3% | Excellent 96.1% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 96.4% | Excellent 95.2% |
10th Grade | Exceptional 95.4% | Excellent 94.1% |
11th Grade | Exceptional 93.9% | Good 92.8% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Exceptional 92.3% | Average 91.3% |
High School Diploma | Exceptional 90.9% | Average 89.1% |
GED/Equivalency | Fair 85.3% | Poor 84.9% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 61.0% | Tragic 63.5% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 53.4% | Tragic 57.2% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 36.5% | Tragic 43.4% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 28.8% | Tragic 34.8% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 11.6% | Tragic 13.4% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.8% | Tragic 3.7% |
Doctorate Degree | Poor 1.7% | Tragic 1.6% |
Alaskan Athabascan vs Hmong Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (5.3% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 55.2%), vision disability (3.1% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 37.4%), and disability age under 5 (1.5% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 28.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (6.3% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 0.13%), cognitive disability (17.6% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 4.8%), and ambulatory disability (6.9% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 5.2%).
Disability Metric | Alaskan Athabascan | Hmong |
Disability | Tragic 14.4% | Tragic 12.8% |
Males | Tragic 14.9% | Tragic 12.5% |
Females | Tragic 13.9% | Tragic 13.1% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.5% | Exceptional 1.1% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 6.3% | Tragic 6.3% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 9.4% | Tragic 8.1% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 15.7% | Tragic 13.1% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 32.4% | Tragic 25.7% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 54.0% | Tragic 48.2% |
Vision | Tragic 3.1% | Tragic 2.3% |
Hearing | Tragic 5.3% | Tragic 3.4% |
Cognitive | Tragic 17.6% | Tragic 18.4% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 6.9% | Tragic 6.6% |
Self-Care | Poor 2.5% | Excellent 2.4% |