Hmong vs South African Community Comparison

COMPARE

Hmong
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
South African
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Hmong

South Africans

Average
Excellent
4,737
SOCIAL INDEX
44.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
196th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
8,851
SOCIAL INDEX
86.0/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
44th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

South African Integration in Hmong Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 22,767,423 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of South Africans within Hmong communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.530. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Hmong within a typical geography, there is an increase of 1.344% in South Africans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Hmong corresponds to an increase of 1,344.0 South Africans.
Hmong Integration in South African Communities

Hmong vs South African Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Hmong and South African communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($38,120 compared to $50,044, a difference of 31.3%), median male earnings ($48,254 compared to $61,460, a difference of 27.4%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($88,115 compared to $109,719, a difference of 24.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.7% compared to 28.0%, a difference of 1.2%), householder income under 25 years ($49,364 compared to $51,383, a difference of 4.1%), and householder income over 65 years ($56,339 compared to $65,652, a difference of 16.5%).
Hmong vs South African Income
Income MetricHmongSouth African
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$38,120
Exceptional
$50,044
Median Family Income
Tragic
$91,296
Exceptional
$113,229
Median Household Income
Tragic
$75,839
Exceptional
$93,379
Median Earnings
Tragic
$42,111
Exceptional
$50,752
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$48,254
Exceptional
$61,460
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$35,498
Exceptional
$41,825
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$49,364
Poor
$51,383
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$84,258
Exceptional
$103,160
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$88,115
Exceptional
$109,719
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$56,339
Exceptional
$65,652
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
27.7%
Tragic
28.0%

Hmong vs South African Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Hmong and South African communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (18.5% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 14.2%), child poverty under the age of 16 (17.1% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 13.9%), and single female poverty (23.1% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 12.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.9% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 1.4%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.4% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 1.4%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.0% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 2.6%).
Hmong vs South African Poverty
Poverty MetricHmongSouth African
Poverty
Poor
12.8%
Excellent
11.7%
Families
Average
9.1%
Exceptional
8.2%
Males
Poor
11.6%
Excellent
10.7%
Females
Fair
13.9%
Excellent
12.8%
Females 18 to 24 years
Average
20.0%
Tragic
21.1%
Females 25 to 34 years
Fair
13.9%
Excellent
13.0%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
18.5%
Exceptional
16.2%
Children Under 16 years
Poor
17.1%
Exceptional
15.0%
Boys Under 16 years
Fair
16.6%
Exceptional
15.2%
Girls Under 16 years
Poor
17.5%
Excellent
15.5%
Single Males
Tragic
14.2%
Average
12.8%
Single Females
Tragic
23.1%
Excellent
20.4%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
15.9%
Good
16.1%
Single Mothers
Tragic
31.2%
Excellent
28.5%
Married Couples
Excellent
5.0%
Exceptional
4.6%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
10.4%
Exceptional
10.3%
Seniors Over 75 years
Good
12.0%
Excellent
11.7%
Receiving Food Stamps
Excellent
10.9%
Exceptional
10.0%

Hmong vs South African Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Hmong and South African communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (13.7% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 82.4%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (4.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 23.8%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.7% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 22.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.7% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 0.050%), unemployment (5.0% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 1.9%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (10.8% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 2.5%).
Hmong vs South African Unemployment
Unemployment MetricHmongSouth African
Unemployment
Exceptional
5.0%
Exceptional
5.1%
Males
Tragic
5.5%
Exceptional
5.0%
Females
Exceptional
4.4%
Good
5.2%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
10.8%
Exceptional
11.1%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
16.3%
Exceptional
16.9%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.4%
Excellent
10.1%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
5.7%
Good
6.6%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
4.9%
Good
5.4%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
5.0%
Average
4.7%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
3.7%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
5.7%
Exceptional
4.7%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.0%
Good
4.8%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
4.2%
Exceptional
5.2%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
4.2%
Exceptional
5.0%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
13.7%
Exceptional
7.5%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
6.7%
Exceptional
7.3%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.7%
Exceptional
8.7%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
4.5%
Good
5.4%

Hmong vs South African Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Hmong and South African communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.7% compared to 36.7%, a difference of 5.4%), in labor force | age 30-34 (82.4% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 3.1%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (77.9% compared to 79.7%, a difference of 2.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (81.7% compared to 82.6%, a difference of 1.1%), in labor force | age 25-29 (83.7% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 1.5%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.1% compared to 65.3%, a difference of 1.9%).
Hmong vs South African Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricHmongSouth African
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
64.1%
Good
65.3%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
77.9%
Good
79.7%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
38.7%
Average
36.7%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
76.5%
Average
75.0%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
83.7%
Excellent
85.0%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
82.4%
Excellent
85.0%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
82.6%
Fair
84.3%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
81.7%
Fair
82.6%

Hmong vs South African Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Hmong and South African communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.4% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 10.8%), births to unmarried women (27.7% compared to 30.5%, a difference of 10.0%), and single mother households (6.4% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 9.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (47.0% compared to 47.3%, a difference of 0.64%), currently married (47.1% compared to 47.6%, a difference of 1.1%), and average family size (3.21 compared to 3.17, a difference of 1.3%).
Hmong vs South African Family Structure
Family Structure MetricHmongSouth African
Family Households
Exceptional
64.9%
Tragic
63.4%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
28.6%
Average
27.4%
Married-couple Households
Good
47.0%
Excellent
47.3%
Average Family Size
Fair
3.21
Tragic
3.17
Single Father Households
Fair
2.4%
Exceptional
2.1%
Single Mother Households
Fair
6.4%
Exceptional
5.8%
Currently Married
Good
47.1%
Exceptional
47.6%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
12.3%
Excellent
11.8%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
27.7%
Excellent
30.5%

Hmong vs South African Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Hmong and South African communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.0% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 12.4%), 3 or more vehicles in household (21.0% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 8.6%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (57.8% compared to 56.2%, a difference of 2.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.6% compared to 90.0%, a difference of 0.39%), no vehicles in household (10.4% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 1.2%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (57.8% compared to 56.2%, a difference of 2.8%).
Hmong vs South African Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricHmongSouth African
No Vehicles Available
Average
10.4%
Good
10.2%
1+ Vehicles Available
Average
89.6%
Good
90.0%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
57.8%
Excellent
56.2%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
21.0%
Fair
19.3%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.0%
Fair
6.2%

Hmong vs South African Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Hmong and South African communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.7% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 52.1%), doctorate degree (1.6% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 49.0%), and master's degree (13.4% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 35.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 6th grade (97.4% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.14%), 5th grade (97.6% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.16%), and 4th grade (97.7% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.19%).
Hmong vs South African Education Level
Education Level MetricHmongSouth African
No Schooling Completed
Excellent
1.9%
Exceptional
1.8%
Nursery School
Good
98.1%
Exceptional
98.3%
Kindergarten
Good
98.1%
Exceptional
98.3%
1st Grade
Good
98.0%
Exceptional
98.2%
2nd Grade
Good
98.0%
Exceptional
98.2%
3rd Grade
Excellent
97.9%
Exceptional
98.1%
4th Grade
Excellent
97.7%
Exceptional
97.9%
5th Grade
Exceptional
97.6%
Exceptional
97.7%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.4%
Exceptional
97.5%
7th Grade
Exceptional
96.4%
Exceptional
96.6%
8th Grade
Excellent
96.1%
Exceptional
96.4%
9th Grade
Excellent
95.2%
Exceptional
95.6%
10th Grade
Excellent
94.1%
Exceptional
94.7%
11th Grade
Good
92.8%
Exceptional
93.6%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Average
91.3%
Exceptional
92.4%
High School Diploma
Average
89.1%
Exceptional
90.6%
GED/Equivalency
Poor
84.9%
Exceptional
87.5%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
63.5%
Exceptional
69.7%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
57.2%
Exceptional
64.1%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
43.4%
Exceptional
51.4%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
34.8%
Exceptional
43.6%
Master's Degree
Tragic
13.4%
Exceptional
18.1%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.7%
Exceptional
5.7%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.6%
Exceptional
2.3%

Hmong vs South African Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Hmong and South African communities in the United States are seen in disability age 18 to 34 (8.1% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 24.0%), disability age 35 to 64 (13.1% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 23.1%), and disability age 65 to 74 (25.7% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 16.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 1.1%), self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 3.5%), and disability age over 75 (48.2% compared to 45.5%, a difference of 5.9%).
Hmong vs South African Disability
Disability MetricHmongSouth African
Disability
Tragic
12.8%
Exceptional
11.4%
Males
Tragic
12.5%
Excellent
11.0%
Females
Tragic
13.1%
Exceptional
11.8%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
1.1%
Exceptional
1.1%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.3%
Good
5.5%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
8.1%
Good
6.5%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
13.1%
Exceptional
10.7%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
25.7%
Exceptional
21.9%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
48.2%
Exceptional
45.5%
Vision
Tragic
2.3%
Good
2.1%
Hearing
Tragic
3.4%
Fair
3.1%
Cognitive
Tragic
18.4%
Exceptional
16.9%
Ambulatory
Tragic
6.6%
Exceptional
5.9%
Self-Care
Excellent
2.4%
Exceptional
2.3%