Ugandan vs Immigrants from Czechoslovakia 2 or more Vehicles in Household

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 93,998,632 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Ugandans and percentage of households with 2 or more vehicles available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.214 and weighted average of 53.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 195,452,090 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and percentage of households with 2 or more vehicles available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.357 and weighted average of 54.1%, a difference of 1.2%.

2 or more Vehicles in Household Correlation Summary

Measurement	Ugandan	Immigrants from Czechoslovakia
Minimum	39.7%	27.0%
Maximum	80.0%	100.0%
Range	40.3%	73.0%
Mean	59.4%	62.9%
Median	57.0%	61.1%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	54.0%	55.8%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	67.8%	70.9%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	13.8%	15.1%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	10.4%	13.9%
Standard Deviation (Population)	10.3%	13.8%

Demographics Similar to Ugandans and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia by 2 or more Vehicles in Household

In terms of 2 or more vehicles in household, the demographic groups most similar to Ugandans are Immigrants from Guatemala (53.5%, a difference of 0.010%), Panamanian (53.5%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Nepal (53.5%, a difference of 0.13%), Immigrants from Turkey (53.6%, a difference of 0.19%), and Alaska Native (53.6%, a difference of 0.21%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Czechoslovakia are Aleut (54.1%, a difference of 0.010%), Guatemalan (54.1%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Western Asia (54.1%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar (53.9%, a difference of 0.31%), and Immigrants from Argentina (53.9%, a difference of 0.36%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	2 or more Vehicles in Household
Guatemalans	9.6 /100 \| #213	Tragic 54.1%
Immigrants \| Czechoslovakia	9.4 /100 \| #214	Tragic 54.1%
Aleuts	9.3 /100 \| #215	Tragic 54.1%
Immigrants \| Western Asia	9.3 /100 \| #216	Tragic 54.1%
Immigrants \| Burma/Myanmar	7.1 /100 \| #217	Tragic 53.9%
Immigrants \| Argentina	6.8 /100 \| #218	Tragic 53.9%
South American Indians	6.5 /100 \| #219	Tragic 53.9%
Taiwanese	6.3 /100 \| #220	Tragic 53.9%
Immigrants \| Singapore	6.3 /100 \| #221	Tragic 53.9%
Kiowa	6.2 /100 \| #222	Tragic 53.9%
Immigrants \| Bosnia and Herzegovina	5.5 /100 \| #223	Tragic 53.8%
Brazilians	5.3 /100 \| #224	Tragic 53.8%
Immigrants \| Egypt	5.2 /100 \| #225	Tragic 53.8%
Immigrants \| Eastern Africa	5.1 /100 \| #226	Tragic 53.7%
Sudanese	4.1 /100 \| #227	Tragic 53.6%
Alaska Natives	3.9 /100 \| #228	Tragic 53.6%
Immigrants \| Turkey	3.8 /100 \| #229	Tragic 53.6%
Immigrants \| Nepal	3.6 /100 \| #230	Tragic 53.5%
Panamanians	3.4 /100 \| #231	Tragic 53.5%
Immigrants \| Guatemala	3.2 /100 \| #232	Tragic 53.5%
Ugandans	3.2 /100 \| #233	Tragic 53.5%