Pima vs Alaskan Athabascan No Vehicles in Household
COMPARE
Pima
Alaskan Athabascan
No Vehicles in Household
No Vehicles in Household Comparison
Pima
Alaskan Athabascans
14.1%
NO VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
292nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
15.6%
NO VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
312th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Pima vs Alaskan Athabascan No Vehicles in Household Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 61,491,377 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Pima and percentage of households with no vehicle available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.454 and weighted average of 14.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 45,793,877 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Alaskan Athabascans and percentage of households with no vehicle available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.685 and weighted average of 15.6%, a difference of 10.4%.
No Vehicles in Household Correlation Summary
Measurement | Pima | Alaskan Athabascan |
Minimum | 2.5% | 1.0% |
Maximum | 29.6% | 100.0% |
Range | 27.1% | 99.0% |
Mean | 14.4% | 37.7% |
Median | 15.3% | 28.5% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 7.4% | 9.1% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 20.7% | 66.7% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 13.3% | 57.6% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 7.5% | 33.1% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 7.4% | 32.8% |
Demographics Similar to Pima and Alaskan Athabascans by No Vehicles in Household
In terms of no vehicles in household, the demographic groups most similar to Pima are Immigrants from Jamaica (14.2%, a difference of 0.66%), Belizean (14.3%, a difference of 1.5%), Paraguayan (14.4%, a difference of 1.6%), Immigrants from Spain (14.5%, a difference of 2.9%), and Immigrants from Panama (14.6%, a difference of 3.6%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Alaskan Athabascans are Immigrants from Israel (15.6%, a difference of 0.15%), Cape Verdean (15.6%, a difference of 0.16%), Puerto Rican (15.5%, a difference of 0.72%), U.S. Virgin Islander (15.4%, a difference of 1.4%), and Immigrants from Haiti (15.4%, a difference of 1.4%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | No Vehicles in Household |
Pima | 0.0 /100 | #292 | Tragic 14.1% |
Immigrants | Jamaica | 0.0 /100 | #293 | Tragic 14.2% |
Belizeans | 0.0 /100 | #294 | Tragic 14.3% |
Paraguayans | 0.0 /100 | #295 | Tragic 14.4% |
Immigrants | Spain | 0.0 /100 | #296 | Tragic 14.5% |
Immigrants | Panama | 0.0 /100 | #297 | Tragic 14.6% |
Moroccans | 0.0 /100 | #298 | Tragic 14.7% |
Immigrants | Greece | 0.0 /100 | #299 | Tragic 14.7% |
Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #300 | Tragic 14.9% |
Immigrants | Ukraine | 0.0 /100 | #301 | Tragic 14.9% |
Haitians | 0.0 /100 | #302 | Tragic 14.9% |
Immigrants | Western Africa | 0.0 /100 | #303 | Tragic 15.0% |
Immigrants | Russia | 0.0 /100 | #304 | Tragic 15.1% |
Immigrants | China | 0.0 /100 | #305 | Tragic 15.2% |
Immigrants | Belize | 0.0 /100 | #306 | Tragic 15.4% |
Immigrants | Haiti | 0.0 /100 | #307 | Tragic 15.4% |
U.S. Virgin Islanders | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic 15.4% |
Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic 15.5% |
Cape Verdeans | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic 15.6% |
Immigrants | Israel | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 15.6% |
Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 15.6% |