Macedonian vs Chickasaw 1 or more Vehicles in Household
COMPARE
Macedonian
Chickasaw
1 or more Vehicles in Household
1 or more Vehicles in Household Comparison
Macedonians
Chickasaw
87.9%
1 OR MORE VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
0.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
260th/ 347
METRIC RANK
92.3%
1 OR MORE VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
42nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Macedonian vs Chickasaw 1 or more Vehicles in Household Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 132,543,746 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Macedonians and percentage of households with 1 or more vehicles available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.490 and weighted average of 87.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,674,268 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and percentage of households with 1 or more vehicles available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.084 and weighted average of 92.3%, a difference of 4.9%.
1 or more Vehicles in Household Correlation Summary
Measurement | Macedonian | Chickasaw |
Minimum | 75.5% | 84.1% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% |
Range | 24.5% | 15.9% |
Mean | 93.1% | 94.5% |
Median | 94.0% | 94.7% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 90.5% | 93.2% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 97.0% | 96.8% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.6% | 3.6% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.6% | 3.4% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.5% | 3.4% |
Similar Demographics by 1 or more Vehicles in Household
Demographics Similar to Macedonians by 1 or more Vehicles in Household
In terms of 1 or more vehicles in household, the demographic groups most similar to Macedonians are Immigrants from Switzerland (87.9%, a difference of 0.040%), Subsaharan African (87.9%, a difference of 0.070%), Nigerian (88.0%, a difference of 0.090%), Colombian (88.0%, a difference of 0.12%), and Liberian (88.0%, a difference of 0.12%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | 1 or more Vehicles in Household |
Hondurans | 1.0 /100 | #253 | Tragic 88.1% |
Haitians | 0.9 /100 | #254 | Tragic 88.1% |
Immigrants | Latvia | 0.9 /100 | #255 | Tragic 88.1% |
Colombians | 0.9 /100 | #256 | Tragic 88.0% |
Liberians | 0.9 /100 | #257 | Tragic 88.0% |
South American Indians | 0.9 /100 | #258 | Tragic 88.0% |
Nigerians | 0.8 /100 | #259 | Tragic 88.0% |
Macedonians | 0.6 /100 | #260 | Tragic 87.9% |
Immigrants | Switzerland | 0.6 /100 | #261 | Tragic 87.9% |
Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.5 /100 | #262 | Tragic 87.9% |
Immigrants | Egypt | 0.5 /100 | #263 | Tragic 87.8% |
Immigrants | Liberia | 0.4 /100 | #264 | Tragic 87.8% |
Africans | 0.4 /100 | #265 | Tragic 87.8% |
Israelis | 0.3 /100 | #266 | Tragic 87.7% |
Immigrants | Colombia | 0.3 /100 | #267 | Tragic 87.6% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by 1 or more Vehicles in Household
In terms of 1 or more vehicles in household, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Spanish (92.3%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Taiwan (92.3%, a difference of 0.010%), Choctaw (92.2%, a difference of 0.020%), Swiss (92.3%, a difference of 0.030%), and Creek (92.3%, a difference of 0.030%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | 1 or more Vehicles in Household |
Czechoslovakians | 99.9 /100 | #35 | Exceptional 92.3% |
Malaysians | 99.9 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 92.3% |
French Canadians | 99.9 /100 | #37 | Exceptional 92.3% |
Immigrants | Vietnam | 99.9 /100 | #38 | Exceptional 92.3% |
Swiss | 99.9 /100 | #39 | Exceptional 92.3% |
Creek | 99.9 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 92.3% |
Immigrants | Taiwan | 99.9 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 92.3% |
Chickasaw | 99.9 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 92.3% |
Spanish | 99.9 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 92.3% |
Choctaw | 99.9 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 92.2% |
Immigrants | Nonimmigrants | 99.9 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 92.2% |
Immigrants | Fiji | 99.9 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 92.2% |
Northern Europeans | 99.9 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 92.2% |
Belgians | 99.9 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 92.1% |
Afghans | 99.9 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 92.1% |